2015
DOI: 10.1007/s40273-015-0285-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Literature Review of the Methods Used to Compare Newer Second-Generation Agents for the Management of Schizophrenia: A focus on Health Technology Assessment

Abstract: This review of comparative effectiveness studies of second-generation antipsychotic agents for schizophrenic patients revealed a wide range of study types, study methodologies, and outcomes. For traditional efficacy outcomes and select safety outcomes, there is strong evidence from many well-conducted studies; however, there are fewer studies of types preferred by HTA with limited head-to-head comparisons and a higher risk of bias in the execution of these studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 195 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also regarding other elements of care for psychosis or schizophrenia, a range of cost-effectiveness studies have been performed. Several of these used health economic decision models, using various modelling techniques [27]. Most modelbased economic evaluations focused on pharmacological interventions in stages later than 'ultra-high risk of psychosis' (UHR) or 'first episode psychosis' (FEP) [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also regarding other elements of care for psychosis or schizophrenia, a range of cost-effectiveness studies have been performed. Several of these used health economic decision models, using various modelling techniques [27]. Most modelbased economic evaluations focused on pharmacological interventions in stages later than 'ultra-high risk of psychosis' (UHR) or 'first episode psychosis' (FEP) [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach to the evaluation of atypical treatments for schizophrenia has been used since 1990 [4]. In the current literature, model-based economic evaluations outweigh clinical trial-based analyses [5,6]. However, model-based studies may generate inconsistent conclusions on cost-effectiveness for the same comparison, even when the same modelling technique is used [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent systematic reviews have not presented current models of pharmacotherapy for schizophrenia, as they have narrowed their search to long-acting/extended-release antipsychotics [5], newer second-generation agents [6], and the relationship between modelling technique and reported outcomes [7]. Although Nemeth et al [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%