2017 International Conference on Next Generation Computing and Information Systems (ICNGCIS) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icngcis.2017.35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Literature Review of Data Quality Within OpenStreetMap

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since individual analyses alone are of limited value, the use of frameworks is desirable (17). Most studies on the quality of OSM data are focused on extrinsic studies of the transport network, which is why there is still a need for research on the quality of POI data (18).…”
Section: Open Street Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since individual analyses alone are of limited value, the use of frameworks is desirable (17). Most studies on the quality of OSM data are focused on extrinsic studies of the transport network, which is why there is still a need for research on the quality of POI data (18).…”
Section: Open Street Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of data in UGC is often questioned as users are not experts. As a result, UGC is more vulnerable to low-quality data compared to other domains [48]. For this reason, some projects use specific tools, like sensors, for data collection to make data more reliable compared to just human-computer interaction [49].…”
Section: User-generated Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the maps and data editors of OSM could have different levels of experience and skills, OSM data may be vulnerable to errors and gaps. Quality issues of the OSM database are wellknown [71]; therefore, using data sets extracted from OSM could be somewhat questionable. The main quality issues include: accuracy of the geometric position, completeness of the database, qualitative and quantitative information accuracy, topological consistency, and semantic accuracy.…”
Section: Limitations and Advancement In The Research Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%