2021
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9091129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Literature Review of Capitation and Fee-for-Service Payment Models for Oral Health Services: An Australian Perspective

Abstract: The aim of this review was to assess relevant global literature on capped-fee (CF) and fee-for-service (FFS) payment models as used by public dental services. Research data were assessed through the PRISMA check list and sourced from MEDLINE, PubMed, ProQuest, Cochrane Library, and other methods. The inclusion criteria were peer reviewed articles published between 2004 and 2020 and (i) other countries’ health systems that were evaluated in contrast to Australia; (ii) care provided to individuals; (iii) payment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 2021 systematic review by Conquest et al on bundled payments and fee-for-service payment models reported that clients favored bundled payments, although moving from fee-for-service to capitation could reduce services provided, including preventive interventions [ 58 ]. This review also suggested that adjusting the way dental practitioners are remunerated is unlikely to achieve all policy goals [ 58 ]; potentially elusive ones address oral health inequities and creating incentives for optimizing the dental workforce skill mix [ 58 ].…”
Section: Global Perspectives For the Value-based Healthcare Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2021 systematic review by Conquest et al on bundled payments and fee-for-service payment models reported that clients favored bundled payments, although moving from fee-for-service to capitation could reduce services provided, including preventive interventions [ 58 ]. This review also suggested that adjusting the way dental practitioners are remunerated is unlikely to achieve all policy goals [ 58 ]; potentially elusive ones address oral health inequities and creating incentives for optimizing the dental workforce skill mix [ 58 ].…”
Section: Global Perspectives For the Value-based Healthcare Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%