2011
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1109363108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic investigation of genetic vulnerabilities across cancer cell lines reveals lineage-specific dependencies in ovarian cancer

Abstract: A comprehensive understanding of the molecular vulnerabilities of every type of cancer will provide a powerful roadmap to guide therapeutic approaches. Efforts such as The Cancer Genome Atlas Project will identify genes with aberrant copy number, sequence, or expression in various cancer types, providing a survey of the genes that may have a causal role in cancer. A complementary approach is to perform systematic loss-of-function studies to identify essential genes in particular cancer cell types. We have begu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
444
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 379 publications
(463 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
14
444
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, genome-wide tools capable of loss-and gain-offunction studies will likely be invaluable in interrogating phenotypes particularly relevant to glioblastoma. Large-scale pooled shRNA screening of a panel of glioblastoma cell lines as part of a larger panel of multiple lineages led to the identification of a list of candidate dependencies (Cheung et al 2011). These approaches should use panels of highly faithful models-murine and human-that recapitulate the salient in vivo behaviors of interest.…”
Section: Identifying Dependencies and Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, genome-wide tools capable of loss-and gain-offunction studies will likely be invaluable in interrogating phenotypes particularly relevant to glioblastoma. Large-scale pooled shRNA screening of a panel of glioblastoma cell lines as part of a larger panel of multiple lineages led to the identification of a list of candidate dependencies (Cheung et al 2011). These approaches should use panels of highly faithful models-murine and human-that recapitulate the salient in vivo behaviors of interest.…”
Section: Identifying Dependencies and Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calculate a gene-specific enrichment score based on the rank distribution of each individual RNAi reagent among all three screens performed by our group (Silencer Select, esiRNA, and SMARTpool), we used the RNAi gene enrichment ranking (RIGER) method that denotes the likelihood that the selected gene plays a role in the phenotype of interest (35,36). We generated the average RIGER score (RIGER3) from three RIGER integrative approaches (the second best, weighted sum, and Kolmogorov-Smirnov) and ranked genes from the most likely host dependence factors to host restriction factors were lysed for IP assays using an anti-FLAG or a mIgG antibody.…”
Section: Rnai Screens Identify Fact Proteins As Top Hiv-1 Restrictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We and others have performed large scale, lossof-function short hairpin RNA (shRNA) screens to identify essential cancer genes and recently reported PAX8 and ID4 as ovarian cancer dependencies (4,5). In other cancer types, both genome-wide and targeted loss-of-function studies were used to identify novel tumor suppressors in hepatocellular carcinoma (6) and epigenetic regulators in lymphomas (7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%