2022
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c05826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Investigation of Docking Failures in Large-Scale Structure-Based Virtual Screening

Abstract: In recent years, large-scale structure-based virtual screening has attracted increasing levels of interest for identification of novel compounds corresponding to potential drug targets. It is critical to understand the strengths and weaknesses of docking algorithms to increase the success rate in practical applications. Here, we systematically investigated the docking successes and failures of two representative docking programs: UCSF DOCK 3.7 and AutoDock Vina. DOCK 3.7 performed better in early enrichment on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, AiKPro demonstrated superior scoring performance when compared to AutoDock Vina, a widely used traditional docking tool. AutoDock Vina mainly scores poses using pairwise interatomic distances and includes a repulsive parabolic function, making it sensitive to bumps and strains 48 . In contrast, AiKPro uses 3D structure information from svMSA and 3CED, allowing approximate binding affinity predictions with significantly reduced computational demands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, AiKPro demonstrated superior scoring performance when compared to AutoDock Vina, a widely used traditional docking tool. AutoDock Vina mainly scores poses using pairwise interatomic distances and includes a repulsive parabolic function, making it sensitive to bumps and strains 48 . In contrast, AiKPro uses 3D structure information from svMSA and 3CED, allowing approximate binding affinity predictions with significantly reduced computational demands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters used in the docking study are listed in Table S3 . All target and ligand structures were prepared as flexible, following the protocol outlined in the literature reference for AutoDock Vina 48 , 49 . The results of the two scoring functions using AutoDock Vina docking were compared with the predictions by AiKPro.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While scoring functions provide a numerical estimate of binding affinity, they can sometimes be misleading due to their inherent limitations, such as the inability to accurately model solvent effects or protein flexibility. Visual inspection helps to confirm that the top-scoring poses are chemically and physically reasonable [55][56][57].…”
Section: Analysis Of Docking Posesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches relying on docking are often used to identify novel scaffolds; however, they present a low success rate [22]. The low rate of success may be associated with the onerous step of identifying hits within an extensive library, which can be time-consuming and often depends on visual analysis.…”
Section: The Native Ros1 Kinase Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%