2010
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-10-0022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Interpretation of Comutated Genes in Large-Scale Cancer Mutation Profiles

Abstract: By high-throughput screens of somatic mutations of genes in cancer genomes, hundreds of cancer genes are being rapidly identified, providing us abundant information for systematically deciphering the genetic changes underlying cancer mechanism. However, the functional collaboration of mutated genes is often neglected in current studies. Here, using four genome-wide somatic mutation data sets and pathways defined in various databases, we showed that gene pairs significantly comutated in cancer samples tend to d… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…proposed a stratified FDR control approach which combined with the traditional statistical test for identifying co-mutated gene pairs in cancer genome ( 14 ). Furthermore, by considering biological pathways, some studies focused on co-occurring pairs between/within pathways ( 15 , 16 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…proposed a stratified FDR control approach which combined with the traditional statistical test for identifying co-mutated gene pairs in cancer genome ( 14 ). Furthermore, by considering biological pathways, some studies focused on co-occurring pairs between/within pathways ( 15 , 16 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these premises, the emergence of combinatorial properties among patterns of genomic events has been investigated in a number of recent studies, through the application of novel statistical measures quantifying, for example, the ‘mutual exclusivity’ or the ‘co-occurrence’ of different genomic lesions (Ciriello et al, 2012; Cui, 2010; Gu et al , 2010; Miller et al , 2011; Vandin et al , 2012; Yeang et al , 2008). Among these studies, those aimed at identifying groups of genes whose mutation patterns tend to ME are based on the same principle and are conceptually similar (Ciriello et al , 2012; Miller et al , 2011; Vandin et al , 2012), although they differ in two crucial methodological aspects:

The way sets of genes to be tested for ME are selected.

The way ME of a gene set is assessed and its statistical significance is quantified.

In (Ciriello et al , 2012), for example, the authors designed MEMo, a computational framework in which gene sets to be tested for ME are derived from cliques (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GOLGB1, the top-ranked gene both with ¼ 3 and 4, has been reported as a gene that is strongly correlated to the in°ammatory carcinoma of breast. 9,17 It also interacts with gene BRMS 1, a breast cancer metastasis suppressor, and gene ACBD3 that plays an important role in asymmetric cell division and breast cancer. 18 The second and third top-ranked gene markers from our MRT-test ( ¼ 3) are CCNT 2 and CBY 1, both of which were also reported to have tissue expression in breast tumors.…”
Section: Biomarker Discovery For Binary-class Datamentioning
confidence: 99%