1998
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.53483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic ichnology of the Late Ordovician Georgian Bay formation of southern Ontario, eastern Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rindsberg (1994) restricted only surface traces to Cochlichnus, and the subsurface forms included in a new ichnogenus Cymatulus. This idea was criticized by Stanley and Pickerill (1998) who regarded Cymatulus as a junior synonym of Cochlichnus.…”
Section: Synopsis Of Trace Fossilsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Rindsberg (1994) restricted only surface traces to Cochlichnus, and the subsurface forms included in a new ichnogenus Cymatulus. This idea was criticized by Stanley and Pickerill (1998) who regarded Cymatulus as a junior synonym of Cochlichnus.…”
Section: Synopsis Of Trace Fossilsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The subsurface forms have been distinguished by the latter author as a new ichnogenus Cymatulus. However, Stanley & Pickerill (1998) argued that the distinction is very subtle and regarded Cymatulus a junior synonym of Cochlichnus. The here described forms are all epichnial grooves, thus their casts belong to Cochlichnus HITCHCOCK.…”
Section: Invertebrate Trace Fossilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specimens of C. anguineus that display the same or very similar features are included in the synonymy list. Forms of C. anguineus from marine or brackish settings are larger (see Stanley & Pickerill 1998, and references therein). The ratio wavelength to amplitude displays three peaks (Fig.…”
Section: Invertebrate Trace Fossilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional analysis of the morphology of the type species of Isotelus, I. gigas, has led to suggestions that larger holaspids were likely predator/scavengers Owens 1999a, 1999b) and may have buried themselves in bottom sediments with only the eyes and more elevated axial parts of the exoskeleton exposed (Rudkin and Tripp, 1989). These suppositions are supported by shallow Rusophycus-type resting traces showing ventral impres sions of large isoteline trilobites from a number of Late Ordovi cian sequences in North America (Osgood, 1970;Stanley and Pickerill, 1998). Large distinctive trace fossils are also found in close association with, and have previously been attributed to, the giant Isotelus in the Churchill River Group of northern Manitoba (Johnson et al, 1988 , fig.…”
Section: Paleobiological and Autecological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 84%