2017
DOI: 10.1002/cem.2885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic examination of the incorporation of class relationships via multilabel, multiclass, hierarchical classification

Abstract: Difficulties in multiclass classification problems often arise as a result of the transformation to a series of one‐class problems, where each class is determined without respect to the results from the other classes. Existing relationships between the classes themselves, rather than the individual samples in each class, are ignored, and the information is not incorporated into the classification model. Alternatively, classifying multiclass samples via a multilabel, hierarchical classification method can incor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantage of a flat multiclass classifier lies in its simplicity and ease of implementation. The notable disadvantage of this model is that it is possible to lose valuable information that may lie in the natural hierarchy of the data by ignoring parent-child class relationships (Daisey and Brown, 2017).…”
Section: Classical (Flat) Multiclass Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of a flat multiclass classifier lies in its simplicity and ease of implementation. The notable disadvantage of this model is that it is possible to lose valuable information that may lie in the natural hierarchy of the data by ignoring parent-child class relationships (Daisey and Brown, 2017).…”
Section: Classical (Flat) Multiclass Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%