2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Evaluation of the Prognostic Impact and Intratumour Heterogeneity of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Biomarkers

Abstract: BackgroundCandidate biomarkers have been identified for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients, but most have not been validated.ObjectiveTo validate published ccRCC prognostic biomarkers in an independent patient cohort and to assess intratumour heterogeneity (ITH) of the most promising markers to guide biomarker optimisation.Design, setting, and participantsCancer-specific survival (CSS) for each of 28 identified genetic or transcriptomic biomarkers was assessed in 350 ccRCC patients. ITH was inter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
133
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
133
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…And if there is variability, it is unknown how it would influence clinical outcome. The use of miRNAs as predictive markers in ccRCC is further supported by the fact that an mRNA gene-expression signature affected by intratumor heterogeneity has been shown to outperform genetic biomarkers for the prediction of ccRCC cancer-specific survival and to add prognostic information to tumor stage and SSIGN prognostic model (42,43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…And if there is variability, it is unknown how it would influence clinical outcome. The use of miRNAs as predictive markers in ccRCC is further supported by the fact that an mRNA gene-expression signature affected by intratumor heterogeneity has been shown to outperform genetic biomarkers for the prediction of ccRCC cancer-specific survival and to add prognostic information to tumor stage and SSIGN prognostic model (42,43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although this makes intuitive sense, we recognize that therapeutically targeting a clonally dominant, truncal driver has not yet been shown to be a more effective drug development strategy ( 9 ). If important for treatment decisions, quantifi cation of this heterogeneity and clonality could have a major impact in the development of companion diagnostics for genotypespecifi c drugs ( 10 ). Of note, the Deciphering Anti-tumor Response With Intratumor Heterogeneity (DARWIN) trial will test whether targeting a clonally dominant driver event results in a better outcome compared with targeting the same driver mutation when present subclonally.…”
Section: See Related Article By Brastianos and Colleagues P 1164 (2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,13 This largely limits the utility of prognostic impact of biomarkers and, in addition, spatial variation in genetic and phenotypic properties poses a significant obstacle for optimal personalized treatment. 14 …”
Section: Intratumoral Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%