2006
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(2006)132:7(696)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Evaluation of One-Dimensional Unsteady Friction Models in Simple Pipelines

Abstract: In this paper, basic unsteady flow types and transient event types are categorised, and then Additionally, numerical errors arising from the approximate implementation of the instantaneous acceleration-based model are determined, suggesting some previous good fits with experimental data are due to numerical error rather than the unsteady friction model.The convolution-based model is successful for all transient event types. Both approaches are tested against experimental data from a laboratory pipeline.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
38
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the frictional force model with the steady and frequency-dependent unsteady items were constructed in the proposed dynamic model. By referring to experimental results in [35,37], the simulation results of two computation methods were verified to indicate that the proposed FDM for transient pressure estimation has the following two advantages:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the frictional force model with the steady and frequency-dependent unsteady items were constructed in the proposed dynamic model. By referring to experimental results in [35,37], the simulation results of two computation methods were verified to indicate that the proposed FDM for transient pressure estimation has the following two advantages:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental results of the transient pressure pulsations close to the valve in the horizontal downstream pipeline are given by Vitkovsky et al [35] and the related parameters of the tested pipeline are listed in Table 2. Here, the element number n is selected as 30 in the simulation.…”
Section: Case 1: Pressure Transients Without Cavitation On the Downstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many approaches have been presented for unsteady friction modeling, such as weighting function-based model [39,40] and the instantaneous acceleration-based model [41,42]. Since this work is not experimentally oriented, the friction factor is considered to be steady.…”
Section: Hydraulic Transient Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A popular way of incorporating unsteady friction is to use the relation described in Vítkovskỳ et al [2006] (originally due to Brunone et al [1995])…”
Section: Frequency-dependent Frictionmentioning
confidence: 99%