2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2018.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Evaluation of Molecular Networks for Discovery of Disease Genes

Abstract: Gene networks are rapidly growing in size and number, raising the question of which networks are most appropriate for particular applications. Here, we evaluate 21 human genome-wide interaction networks for their ability to recover 446 disease gene sets identified through literature curation, gene expression profiling, or genome-wide association studies. While all networks have some ability to recover disease genes, we observe a wide range of performance with STRING, ConsensusPathDB, and GIANT networks having … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
243
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(267 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
11
243
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Together the two approaches helped overcome their respective inherent limitations: gaps in identification because of the stochastic nature of LFQ, and compression of the magnitude change in TMT due to overlapping contaminants and MS/MS reporter signals . Interpretation of the changes to the proteome were greatly assisted with pathway analysis tools like IPA, REACTOME, and STRING, but even after discovering a functionally connected network with these tools, its size and statistical significance were enhanced with a substantial effort in manual curation, a strategy that has been emphasized by others …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together the two approaches helped overcome their respective inherent limitations: gaps in identification because of the stochastic nature of LFQ, and compression of the magnitude change in TMT due to overlapping contaminants and MS/MS reporter signals . Interpretation of the changes to the proteome were greatly assisted with pathway analysis tools like IPA, REACTOME, and STRING, but even after discovering a functionally connected network with these tools, its size and statistical significance were enhanced with a substantial effort in manual curation, a strategy that has been emphasized by others …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis identified 394 genes for which methylation values showed conserved time-dependent behavior across species (empirical p < 0.05, Figure S3, Table S2 ). To understand the underlying gene functions we mapped them onto the Parsimonious Composite Network (PCNet), a database of approximately 2⨉10 6 molecular interactions capturing physical and functional relationships among genes and gene products, in which each interaction has support from multiple sources (Huang et al 2018) . The genes clustered into five highly interconnected network modules ( Figure 3 ), nearly all of which were enriched for developmental functions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collecting all connections together generated regulatory networks for the Paneth cell enriched enteroid (PCeE) and goblet cell enriched enteroid (GCeE) datasets. This approach to collating networks (regulatory or otherwise) has been used for a wide variety of research aims, such as the identification of genes functioning in a variety of diseases (75,76), the prioritisation of therapeutic targets (77) and for a more general understanding of gene regulation in biological systems (78,79). The application of prior knowledge avoids the need for reverse engineering / inference of regulatory network connections, which is time consuming, computationally expensive and requires large quantities of high quality data (80).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%