The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-5013-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic evaluation of isoform function in literature reports of alternative splicing

Abstract: BackgroundAlthough most genes in mammalian genomes have multiple isoforms, an ongoing debate is whether these isoforms are all functional as well as the extent to which they increase the functional repertoire of the genome. To ground this debate in data, it would be helpful to have a corpus of experimentally-verified cases of genes which have functionally distinct splice isoforms (FDSIs).ResultsWe established a curation framework for evaluating experimental evidence of FDSIs, and analyzed over 700 human and mo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the uncertainty about the number of genes strongly decreased in the past 20 years (compare Figure and Figure ), the number of generated transcripts remains largely unclear (Figure B). It steadily increased in RefSeq, GENCODE, and other databases over the past ten years, from about 60 000 in 2009 to 210 000 in 2018, but it is not clear yet, to which extent these transcripts result from erroneous splicing or are translated to a significant level, if at all …”
Section: Is There Consensus On the Low‐hanging Fruits?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the uncertainty about the number of genes strongly decreased in the past 20 years (compare Figure and Figure ), the number of generated transcripts remains largely unclear (Figure B). It steadily increased in RefSeq, GENCODE, and other databases over the past ten years, from about 60 000 in 2009 to 210 000 in 2018, but it is not clear yet, to which extent these transcripts result from erroneous splicing or are translated to a significant level, if at all …”
Section: Is There Consensus On the Low‐hanging Fruits?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…research papers [13,14], but there are no large-scale analyses of tissue specificity at the protein level. One reason for this is that proteomics experiments detect many fewer alternative isoforms than would be expected [15,16], It is not clear why it is so hard to detect alternative protein isoforms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little research has been carried out into tissue-specific alternative splicing at the protein level. Examples of protein level tissue specificity have been highlighted in analyses of individual research papers [ 13 , 14 ] , but there are no large-scale analyses of tissue specificity at the protein level. One reason for this is that proteomics experiments detect many fewer alternative isoforms than would be expected [ 15 , 16 ] , It is not clear why it is so hard to detect alternative protein isoforms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, there has been a general debate as to whether protein isoforms encoded by the multiple splice forms of a particular gene are produced and functional. One extreme, based on evidence from high throughput mass-spectrometry or literature curation of verified proteoforms, contends that most genes encoding multiple alternatively spliced isoforms only produce a single functional proteoform [34,35]. In contrast, an alternative view is that alternatively spliced isoforms generate proteoforms with functionally distinct properties in terms of spatial or temporal expression, or their interaction repertoires [36,37].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%