2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic errors in orthology inference and their effects on evolutionary analyses

Abstract: The availability of complete sets of genes from many organisms makes it possible to identify genes unique to (or lost from) certain clades. This information is used to reconstruct phylogenetic trees; identify genes involved in the evolution of clade specific novelties; and for phylostratigraphy-identifying ages of genes in a given species. These investigations rely on accurately predicted orthologs. Here we use simulation to produce sets of orthologs that experience no gains or losses. We show that errors in i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(54 reference statements)
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2c). Because other data have shown the monophyly of Xenacoelomorpha to be robust, we interpret this result as being the result of systematic error caused by a high rate of gene loss or by orthologs being incorrectly scored as missing due to higher rates of sequence evolution in acoelomorphs 26 .…”
Section: The Genome Of a Potential Symbiont Chlamydiamentioning
confidence: 92%
“…2c). Because other data have shown the monophyly of Xenacoelomorpha to be robust, we interpret this result as being the result of systematic error caused by a high rate of gene loss or by orthologs being incorrectly scored as missing due to higher rates of sequence evolution in acoelomorphs 26 .…”
Section: The Genome Of a Potential Symbiont Chlamydiamentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, we observed good congruence across datasets over the topology in Fig. 2 (Genome Gene Content), indicating that errors induced by ortho-and homogroup misidentifications were negligible (contra Natsidis et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…However, we observed good congruence across datasets over the topology in Fig. 2 (Genome Gene Content), indicating that errors induced by misidentifications of orthogroups were negligible (contra 42 ), while homogroup-based topologies were less congruent mostly when high inflation values were used for the predictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1H) (Wasik, et al 2015; Wudarski, et al 2017). It is possible that the large number of specific orthology groups in M. lignano is associated with the divergence of these duplicated genes (Holland, et al 2017; Natsidis, et al 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%