1980
DOI: 10.6028/jres.085.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic errors in an isoperibol solution calorimeter measured with standard reference reactions

Abstract: Syste mati c erro rs in an isope ribol calorimete r of a wid e ly.used design, amou nting to a bout 0.5 pe rce nt of the e nd othermi c enthalpy of solu tion of S RM 1 655 (KCI) in H20 , were fou nd to be th e res ult of e rro rs in hea t leak co rrections due to in adeq uate s tirring and comm onl y used calo rimetric procedures.Other systematic e rrors we re found in meas urements of the enthalpy of soluti o n of the exothermic reaction of tri s(hydroxymethyl)aminomethan e in aq ueou s HCI so lution.Recom me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 perce nt in th e enthalp y of solution of KBr measured by three high-precision ca lori meters. Another recent stud y [3] showed errors in heat tra nsfer co rrecti ons in iso peribol cal orimeters due to some cal orim etric procedures. Th ese sources of un certainty ca n be avo ided by th e use of a standard reference material of KCl from a single source (such as SRM 1655) if the recomm ended procedures are followed .…”
Section: Intraductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…7 perce nt in th e enthalp y of solution of KBr measured by three high-precision ca lori meters. Another recent stud y [3] showed errors in heat tra nsfer co rrecti ons in iso peribol cal orimeters due to some cal orim etric procedures. Th ese sources of un certainty ca n be avo ided by th e use of a standard reference material of KCl from a single source (such as SRM 1655) if the recomm ended procedures are followed .…”
Section: Intraductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 0 J·mor l (0.8%). This was probab ly due to d ifferent methods of sample preparation and drying as well as systemati c errors in the calorimetry [3]. Gunn [4] s howed differences of as much as 35 J.mor l (0 .2%) in M ,o)n of samples with different ori gin s and drying procedures.…”
Section: Intraductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations