1998
DOI: 10.1118/1.598425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic distortions in magnetic position digitizers

Abstract: Medical devices equipped with position sensors enable applications like image guided surgical interventions, reconstruction of three-dimensional 3D ultrasound (US) images, and virtual or augmented reality systems. The acquisition of three-dimensional position data in real time is one of the key technologies in this field. The systematic distortions induced by various metals, surgical tools, and US scan probes in different commercial electromagnetic tracking systems were assessed in the presented work. A precis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
69
1
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
69
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One possibility to reasonably compare these results is to consider the error as a percentage of the measured distance, as did Day et al [25] who found jitter errors up to 5 % and positional errors up to 3 % for the Polhemus Fastrak R system. Birkfellner et al compared the Polhemus Isotrak II R system to the Ascension Bird system and found the Isotrak II R to be more accurate but less robust against metallic distortions than the competing device [16]. Koerting assessed the Isotrak II R system in a thesis and found errors in the order of a couple of millimeters [82].…”
Section: B Study Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One possibility to reasonably compare these results is to consider the error as a percentage of the measured distance, as did Day et al [25] who found jitter errors up to 5 % and positional errors up to 3 % for the Polhemus Fastrak R system. Birkfellner et al compared the Polhemus Isotrak II R system to the Ascension Bird system and found the Isotrak II R to be more accurate but less robust against metallic distortions than the competing device [16]. Koerting assessed the Isotrak II R system in a thesis and found errors in the order of a couple of millimeters [82].…”
Section: B Study Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other Barratt et al [7] Position and rotation phantoms Yoo et al [207] Custom-build for C-arm Kirsch et al [74] Distortion of metals Birkfellner et al [16] 6 DoF Phantom, distortion assessment…”
Section: A Assessment Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore the authors in [10] and [13] have used a commercial CAS system (ARTMA Virtual Patient System, ARTMA Medizintechnik Vienna, Austria) for implantology. These experiments utilized electromagnetic trackers which exhibit erratic behavior in metallic environments [2]; furthermore, a patient-to-CT registration protocol requiring a slice thickness of 3 mm was used. Therefore the accuracy reported was in the vicinity of 3 mm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two main types of sensor; one that uses an AC (alternating current), and one a DC (direct current). Each is affected to some extent by the presence of metallic (AC sensors) or ferromagnetic (DC sensors) materials in the vicinity [24]. However, they allow complete freedom of movement, and do not require a line of sight.…”
Section: Automatic Position Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%