2014
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2014.55
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic differences in the response of genetic variation to pedigree and genome-based selection methods

Abstract: Genomic selection (GS) is a DNA-based method of selecting for quantitative traits in animal and plant breeding, and offers a potentially superior alternative to traditional breeding methods that rely on pedigree and phenotype information. Using a 60 K SNP chip with markers spaced throughout the entire chicken genome, we compared the impact of GS and traditional BLUP (best linear unbiased prediction) selection methods applied side-by-side in three different lines of egg-laying chickens. Differences were demonst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
3
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
32
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we use the fixation index ( F ST , Holsinger & Weir, ) to estimate the level of genetic differentiation and to detect the SNPs under selection between the early and late selection lines. In other selection line studies, it has been used successfully, for example in chicken, where the F ST method detected regions with changes in allele frequencies (i.e., signatures of selection) between lines bred for either meat or eggs (Boschiero et al, ) and between three different lines of egg layers (Heidaritabar et al, ). An additional “sliding window analysis,” where a window of a certain length slides along the genotypes, checks whether SNPs under selection cluster in certain genomic regions (Tajima, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we use the fixation index ( F ST , Holsinger & Weir, ) to estimate the level of genetic differentiation and to detect the SNPs under selection between the early and late selection lines. In other selection line studies, it has been used successfully, for example in chicken, where the F ST method detected regions with changes in allele frequencies (i.e., signatures of selection) between lines bred for either meat or eggs (Boschiero et al, ) and between three different lines of egg layers (Heidaritabar et al, ). An additional “sliding window analysis,” where a window of a certain length slides along the genotypes, checks whether SNPs under selection cluster in certain genomic regions (Tajima, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the beginning of chromosome 12, we identified another bin with a high rIBD signal, hinting at a locus that contains Asian introgressed haplotypes. This region overlaps the FASN gene that was previously described as fatty acid synthase and an important gene involved in fat deposition [42]. In addition to the genes described in this paragraph, our 11 regions that were used in the association analysis can be found in the 25 bins that span the top 1% of introgressed regions in the genome.…”
Section: (B) Fat-related Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In GP, the proportion of variance explained by the markers, and how well the distribution of mutational effects is known, is crucial for GP to work well (Goddard 2009); but there is also a need to control inbreeding in genomic selection (Sonesson et al 2012;Toro et al 2014). Genomic selection can lead to acceleration erosion of variation at specific loci in the genome (Heidaritabar et al 2014), and its efficiency may be hampered by maintaining diversity (Clark et al 2013). Recent simulation results (MacLeod et al 2014) indicate that resequencing data could recover the missing genetic variance, and a better accuracy in the prediction is achieved with resequencing data for populations with large Ne.…”
Section: Impact Of Management On Selection Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%