“…Insufficient information on the development and the content of any health promotion program not only poses limits to adequate program evaluation (Sidani & Sechrest, 1999), but also to conducting meta‐analytic reviews of intervention effectiveness in the future (Abraham & Michie, in press). Recently, more publications have described the development of programs for primary prevention purposes, such as safe sex in different (high‐)risk populations for HIV‐infection (Kok, Harterink, Vriens, de Zwart, & Hospers, 2006; van Empelen, Kok, Schaalma, & Bartholomew, 2003), stress management among adolescents (Kraag, Kok, Abu‐Saab, Lamberts, & Fekkes, 2005), and (safe) sex education for HIV‐positive MSM (van Kesteren, Kok, Hospers, Schippers, & de Wildt, 2006). Fewer publications described the development of programs for secondary prevention purposes aimed at early detection through screening, such as cervical cancer screening (Hou, Fernandez, & Parcel, 2004).…”