2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.06.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Detection of Amino Acid Substitutions in Proteomes Reveals Mechanistic Basis of Ribosome Errors and Selection for Translation Fidelity

Abstract: Highlights d A new methodology to detect and quantify most translation errors in proteomes d Most amino acid substitutions result from mis-pairing between codons and anti-codons d Proteins' error rates are reduced at conserved and highly expressed proteins d Translation speed is negatively correlated with error rates

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
185
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
7
185
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors of the latter study define exchanges as near cognate errors (NeCE) when two of the three bases between error bearing origin and destination codon match and as non-cognate error (NoCE) when there is no such match between possible error bearing origin and destination codons. Interestingly, 5 of the 8 substitutions we found to be abundant in Arabidopsis (Asn->Met, Ala->Asp, Pro->Glu, Asp->Asn, Glu->Gln) were also abundant in yeast but not E.coli, and three (Ala->Asp, Asp->Asn, Glu->Gln) were NeCEs suggesting conserved patterns of translational error in eukaryotes, a possible method of generating random phenotype variants in genetically identical organisms (Mordret et al, 2019).…”
Section: Chronology and Model Of Phytohormones In Ptimentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The authors of the latter study define exchanges as near cognate errors (NeCE) when two of the three bases between error bearing origin and destination codon match and as non-cognate error (NoCE) when there is no such match between possible error bearing origin and destination codons. Interestingly, 5 of the 8 substitutions we found to be abundant in Arabidopsis (Asn->Met, Ala->Asp, Pro->Glu, Asp->Asn, Glu->Gln) were also abundant in yeast but not E.coli, and three (Ala->Asp, Asp->Asn, Glu->Gln) were NeCEs suggesting conserved patterns of translational error in eukaryotes, a possible method of generating random phenotype variants in genetically identical organisms (Mordret et al, 2019).…”
Section: Chronology and Model Of Phytohormones In Ptimentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Next to the prevalence of known artificial and biologically occurring modifications, amino 814 acid substitutions were found to be common. Such exchanges are generally caused by815 ribosome infidelity, have a number of biological implications and have been reported 816 previously in human cell lines(Chick et al, 2015), human tissue (Bagwan et al, 2018)817 and in E.coli and yeast in detail(Mordret et al, 2019). The authors of the latter study 818 define exchanges as near cognate errors (NeCE) when two of the three bases between 819 error bearing origin and destination codon match and as non-cognate error (NoCE) 820 when there is no such match between possible error bearing origin and destination 821 codons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is possible to speculate that ribosomal frameshifting might enhance phenotypic variability of immunological repertoires, such as the T-cell receptor. A more conservative alternative is that the T-cell system may have evolved to balance the tradeoff between translation fidelity and speed, as has been discussed in other cellular contexts 34,35 . According to this possibility, reduction in modification allows cells to translate proteins more rapidly, i.e.…”
Section: Thus the Faster Decline In Expansion Of Memory T Cells Mighmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This spectrum may also correspond to the substitution of F6 with Y6 [20]. Clearly, the aligned-spectra view shows more information than the single-spectrum view.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%