2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.06.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic comparison of various oxidation treatments on diamond surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation could be well explained by our previous report on diamond oxidation, which reveals that the oxidative rate of an acid mixture is temperature-dependent. 34 Overall, a reaction temperature of 190 °C was found as the optimal temperature to leave adequate hydrogen atoms and resulted in a decent amount of electron-withdrawing groups on diamond surfaces upon both oxidation methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This observation could be well explained by our previous report on diamond oxidation, which reveals that the oxidative rate of an acid mixture is temperature-dependent. 34 Overall, a reaction temperature of 190 °C was found as the optimal temperature to leave adequate hydrogen atoms and resulted in a decent amount of electron-withdrawing groups on diamond surfaces upon both oxidation methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In this study, we use near-surface high density NV center ensembles (implanted with 15 N at an energy of 2.5 keV and a fluence of 2 × 10 12 cm –2 ), distributed ∼5 nm underneath the diamond surface, ,, to investigate the effect of aqueous electrolyte solutions on the spin–lattice relaxation time T 1 probed by NV relaxometry. Before experiments are conducted, we prepare the diamond surface with a triacid clean procedure according to Brown et al This procedure not only ensures the removal of non-diamond carbon material from the interface but also creates an oxidized surface comprised of hydroxyl groups, ethers, ketones, aldehydes, and carboxylic acids . We position the diamond in a microfluidic device that guarantees controllable in- and output of the applied liquids, prevents sample evaporation, and provides a constant and defined volume for following measurements (see Figure a) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before experiments are conducted, we prepare the diamond surface with a triacid clean procedure according to Brown et al 38 This procedure not only ensures the removal of non-diamond carbon material from the interface but also creates an oxidized surface comprised of hydroxyl groups, ethers, ketones, aldehydes, and carboxylic acids. 39 We position the diamond in a microfluidic device that guarantees controllable in-and output of the applied liquids, prevents sample evaporation, and provides a constant and defined volume for following measurements (see Figure 1a). 15 Importantly, the microfluidic device avoids direct contact between the liquid and the microwave delivery.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower energy peak at 1740 cm −1 is probably due to the presence of abundant carboxylic acid groups as a result of oxidizing acid treatment. [ 41 ] The higher energy CO peak at 1800 cm −1 is typical for air‐oxidized NDs and is often ascribed to carboxylic acid, anhydride groups, or lactones. [ 18 ] In the case of HPHT ND‐O‐H, the CO as well as the OH‐related features diminished, and the spectrum is dominated by three prominent peaks at 2833, 2848, and 2920 cm −1 corresponding to the CH stretching on (111), (110), and (100) facets of the nanodiamonds, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%