1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-1063(1997)7:4<371::aid-hipo3>3.0.co;2-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic comparison of the effects of hippocampal and fornix-fimbria lesions on acquisition of three configural discriminations

Abstract: The effects of lesions to the hippocampal system on acquisition of three different configural tasks by rats were tested. Lesions of either the hippocampus (kainic acid/colchicine) or fornix-fimbria (radiofrequency current) were made before training. After recovery from surgery, rats were trained to discriminate between simple and compoundconfigural cues that signaled the availability or nonavailability of food when a bar was pressed. When positive cues were present, one food pellet could be earned by pressing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
84
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
7
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Episodic memory may involve hippocampal-dependent encoding of a conjunctive entity (or entities) derived from multiple cues that assume a different meaning or salience from that of the individual cues. However, nonlinear discrimination tasks requiring conjunctive representations may be acquired in rodents with extensive hippocampal lesions (O'Reilly and Rudy, 2001), including tasks that are formally indistinguishable from the paired associate task used in the present study (Winocur and Olds, 1978;McDonald et al, 1997;Good et al, 1998). Thus, a requirement for conjunctive encoding does not by itself incur hippocampal dependence for learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Episodic memory may involve hippocampal-dependent encoding of a conjunctive entity (or entities) derived from multiple cues that assume a different meaning or salience from that of the individual cues. However, nonlinear discrimination tasks requiring conjunctive representations may be acquired in rodents with extensive hippocampal lesions (O'Reilly and Rudy, 2001), including tasks that are formally indistinguishable from the paired associate task used in the present study (Winocur and Olds, 1978;McDonald et al, 1997;Good et al, 1998). Thus, a requirement for conjunctive encoding does not by itself incur hippocampal dependence for learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose to investigate the current task using fornix transection, rather than selective hippocampal lesions. Fornix transection interrupts the subcortical inputs and outputs of the hippocampus, and has previously been shown to have equivalent effects in a number of tasks to direct lesions to the hippocampus (Aggleton et al, 1992;Wible et al, 1992;Whishaw and Jarrard, 1995), although their effects are not always identical (McDonald et al, 1997). Importantly, transection of the fornix avoids damage to any of the cortical areas surrounding the hippocampus, particularly areas of rhinal cortex, and so may be a better way to produce selective hippocampal dysfunction than direct lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that this type of arrangement almost guarantees that the animal will experience the correct inputs from the context features, the cues, the response, and the outcomes. Rats with complete damage to the hippocampal formation learn these discriminations as readily as intact animals (McDonald et al 1997;Good et al 1998;Coutureau et al 2002).…”
Section: Conditional Discrimination Type Imentioning
confidence: 99%