2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2006.04.082
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic comparison of ISOLDE-SC yields with calculated in-target production rates

Abstract: Recently, a series of dedicated inverse-kinematics experiments performed at GSI, Darmstadt, has brought an important progress in our understanding of proton and heavy-ion induced reactions at relativistic energies. The nuclear reaction code ABRABLA that has been developed and benchmarked against the results of these experiments has been used to calculate nuclide production cross sections at different energies and with different targets and beams. These calculations are used to estimate nuclide production rates… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This scenario corresponds to the two-stage reaction scheme proposed for the future EURISOL facility [30] where the high-power target station could produce up to 10 15 neutron-induced fissions of 238 U per second. Taking into account an extraction efficiency from the ISOL stage for 132 Sn of 42% [16] and a total post-acceleration efficiency of 10% [30] one obtains the mentioned intensity for a 132 Sn beam accelerated at few hundred MeVs per nucleon. The results indicate that the proposed production scheme would not only overcome the limited efficiency of ISOL facilities for the extraction of isotopes of refractory elements between Zr and Rh, but also would produce a large variety of neutron-rich nuclei in this region of the chart of nuclides.…”
Section: Model Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This scenario corresponds to the two-stage reaction scheme proposed for the future EURISOL facility [30] where the high-power target station could produce up to 10 15 neutron-induced fissions of 238 U per second. Taking into account an extraction efficiency from the ISOL stage for 132 Sn of 42% [16] and a total post-acceleration efficiency of 10% [30] one obtains the mentioned intensity for a 132 Sn beam accelerated at few hundred MeVs per nucleon. The results indicate that the proposed production scheme would not only overcome the limited efficiency of ISOL facilities for the extraction of isotopes of refractory elements between Zr and Rh, but also would produce a large variety of neutron-rich nuclei in this region of the chart of nuclides.…”
Section: Model Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a technical point of view, ISOL facilities produce the largest in-target yields of fission products [15], however, the refractory nature of many of them results in rather poor extraction efficiencies, in particular for those nuclei with the largest neutron excess and consequently with the shortest half lives [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The francium ions cover a wide range of masses, from A ¼ 200 [44] to 233 [45]. Their yields vary from < 1 to > 10 8 atoms per second, depending on the reaction cross section, the diffusion and effusion properties of the target, and the half-life of each isotope [46]. In the region of A ≥ 220, the yields are 10 7 ions per second [46], while the predicted yields of the isobaric polonium atoms are < 10 3 .…”
Section: A Suppression Of Surface-ionized Ionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their yields vary from < 1 to > 10 8 atoms per second, depending on the reaction cross section, the diffusion and effusion properties of the target, and the half-life of each isotope [46]. In the region of A ≥ 220, the yields are 10 7 ions per second [46], while the predicted yields of the isobaric polonium atoms are < 10 3 . In order to demonstrate the suitability of the LIST in the region of the nuclear chart with A ∼ 220, the suppression of 218 Fr has been studied.…”
Section: A Suppression Of Surface-ionized Ionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation