2008
DOI: 10.1021/jp076825d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Comparison of Empirical Forcefields for Molecular Dynamic Simulation of Insulin

Abstract: The use of atomistic simulation methodologies based on empirical forcefields has enhanced our understanding of many physical processes governing protein structure and dynamics. However, the forcefields used in classical modeling studies are often designed for a particular class of proteins and rely on continuous improvement and validation by comparison of simulations with experimental data. We present a comprehensive comparison of five popular forcefields for simulating insulin. The effect of each forcefield o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
48
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
6
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aliev and Courtier-Murias also found a strong dependence of the structure of small open chain peptides on the force field used [78]. A similar result was found in simulations of insulin using CHARMM, AMBER, OPLS, and GROMOS, as different structural trends are favoured depending on the force field chosen [79]. One of the most detailed evaluation of existing potentials has been performed by Paton and Goodman.…”
Section: Popular Force Fieldssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Aliev and Courtier-Murias also found a strong dependence of the structure of small open chain peptides on the force field used [78]. A similar result was found in simulations of insulin using CHARMM, AMBER, OPLS, and GROMOS, as different structural trends are favoured depending on the force field chosen [79]. One of the most detailed evaluation of existing potentials has been performed by Paton and Goodman.…”
Section: Popular Force Fieldssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…This widely used forcefield has been tested against NMR-spectroscopic data in case of the lysozyme protein in water by Soares et al 66 and has been found to reproduce its solution structure and conformational behavior very well. In a recent work, Todorova et al 67 performed extensive MD simulations on the 51-amino-acid protein insulin and subjected the GROMOS96-43A1 forcefield to a systematic comparison against other popular biomolecular forcefields, including the CHARMM27-, AMBER03-, OPLS-, and GROMOS96-53A6-forcefields. They analyzed in detail the effect of each forcefield on the conformational evolution and structural properties of the protein and compared the results with the available experimental data.…”
Section: B Simulation Details and System Preparation 1 Simulation Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This widely used forcefield has been tested against NMR spectroscopic data in case of the hen egg white globular protein lysozyme in water by Soares et al 27 and has been found to reproduce its solution structure and conformational behaviour very well. In a recent work, Todorova et al 28 performed extensive MD simulations on the 51-amino-acid protein, insulin, and subjected the GROMOS43A1 forcefield to a systematic comparison against other popular biomolecular forcefields, including the CHARMM27-, AMBER03-, OPLS-and GROMOS53A6 forcefields. They analysed in detail the effect of each forcefield on the conformational evolution and structural properties of the protein and compared the results with the available experimental data.…”
Section: Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%