2021
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2020.3034255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Characterization of Dual Probes for Electromagnetic Near-Field Measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And E meas is the electric field ( Z ‐direction) measured by the dual probe as shown in Figure 4. On the contrary, if the measured magnetic field component is larger than E meas − γ e + 6 dB, where 6 dB is the margin of measurement [32], the measured magnetic field is accurate [29]. Similarly, the magnetic field isolation is calculated by the same way.…”
Section: Characterisation Of the Dual Probementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…And E meas is the electric field ( Z ‐direction) measured by the dual probe as shown in Figure 4. On the contrary, if the measured magnetic field component is larger than E meas − γ e + 6 dB, where 6 dB is the margin of measurement [32], the measured magnetic field is accurate [29]. Similarly, the magnetic field isolation is calculated by the same way.…”
Section: Characterisation Of the Dual Probementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isolation of magnetic field and electric field is a very important parameter for the dual probe. It is related to the design of the probe [29]. This parameter evaluates the interaction between the measured electric field and magnetic field components.…”
Section: Isolation Of Electric and Magnetic Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations