1981
DOI: 10.1002/jhrc.1240041006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic and statistical errors in quantitative evaluation in TLC and HPTLC. 4. Linear calibration

Abstract: SummaryAnalytical results are often obtained from reflectance or fluorescence measurements in TLCor HPTLC with the aid of calibration lines. Curve fitting may not be done by conventional least squares methods for both the independent and the dependent variables are erroneous; errors occur in the volumes spotted on to the plate and in the reflectance/fluorescence measurements. Therefore the sum of the squares of the distances to the calibration line has to be minimized instead of the squared sum of the errors o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This nonlinearity is valid for both peak height and peak area measurements. A detailed interpretation of the problems is presented in the papers of Ebel and coworkers (149)(150)(151)(152)(153)(154)(155)(156).…”
Section: Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This nonlinearity is valid for both peak height and peak area measurements. A detailed interpretation of the problems is presented in the papers of Ebel and coworkers (149)(150)(151)(152)(153)(154)(155)(156).…”
Section: Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%