2009
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.20336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic analysis of interference due to stutter in estimating chimerism following hematopoietic cell transplantation

Abstract: Stutter formed during amplification of short tandem repeats (STRs) interfere with accurate engraftment monitoring following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We describe a mathematical approach to minimize the contribution of stutter when estimating chimerism following HCT. Pretransplant DNA samples from 409 donors and recipients were used to define marker-specific stutter cut-off values for all makers used in the AMPFlSTR Profiler Plus amplification kit. Mock chimerism samples (5, 20, and 50%) were us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has proved to be a reliable assay in the setting of AML, where NK donor expansion is seen with 90–100% donor chimerism (29). The test was performed by the University of Minnesota clinical molecular diagnostics laboratory (30). The primary endpoint of the study was to evaluate the successful in vivo expansion of the infused allogeneic donor NK cell product.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has proved to be a reliable assay in the setting of AML, where NK donor expansion is seen with 90–100% donor chimerism (29). The test was performed by the University of Minnesota clinical molecular diagnostics laboratory (30). The primary endpoint of the study was to evaluate the successful in vivo expansion of the infused allogeneic donor NK cell product.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antigens evaluated included CD3, CD7, CD10, CD13, CD14, CD15, CD19, CD33, CD34, CD45, CD56, CD117, and HLA-DR. Myeloid maturation patterns by flow cytometry were not evaluated. Engraftment/chimerism analysis was performed as previously described [ 10 ], with interpretive reports reviewed for this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%