2011
DOI: 10.3327/taesj.j10.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic Analysis Method for Radioactive Wastes Generated from Nuclear Research Facilities

Abstract: Analytical methods have been developed for the simple and rapid determination of radioactive nuclides, which are selected as important nuclides for the safety assessment of the disposal of wastes generated from research facilities. We advanced the development of a high-e‹ciency nondestructive measurement technique for g ray-emitting nuclides, simple and rapid methods for the pretreatment of hard-to-dissolve samples and subsequent radiochemical separation, and rapid determination methods for long-lived nuclide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, separation of U from various matrix elements is necessary to avoid the matrix effect and the radioactive contamination. Ion exchange and extraction chromatography were reported [3][4][5][6][7][8] as conventional bulk-scale methods of U separation from interfered Cs-137 and matrix metal ions. However, these methods are disadvantageous as they are manually operated, have long separation periods, and generate high volumes of waste solutions, increasing the risk of radiation exposure for analysis workers while generating a large amount of secondary radioactive wastes (e.g., consumable supplies and solutions).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, separation of U from various matrix elements is necessary to avoid the matrix effect and the radioactive contamination. Ion exchange and extraction chromatography were reported [3][4][5][6][7][8] as conventional bulk-scale methods of U separation from interfered Cs-137 and matrix metal ions. However, these methods are disadvantageous as they are manually operated, have long separation periods, and generate high volumes of waste solutions, increasing the risk of radiation exposure for analysis workers while generating a large amount of secondary radioactive wastes (e.g., consumable supplies and solutions).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%