2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systematic analysis and multi-objective optimization of integrated power generation cycle for a thermal power plant using Genetic algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other references have also utilized optimization algorithms including genetic algorithm (GA) on this topic. In [28] a multi-objective optimization problem in an integrated power generation system in the presence of taxes was solved using GA. The results indicated that this algorithm has successfully converged the problem.…”
Section: Table I Classification Of Reviewed Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other references have also utilized optimization algorithms including genetic algorithm (GA) on this topic. In [28] a multi-objective optimization problem in an integrated power generation system in the presence of taxes was solved using GA. The results indicated that this algorithm has successfully converged the problem.…”
Section: Table I Classification Of Reviewed Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the assumption that the two objectives are to be minimized, the best (or the lowest) objective 1 (or F 1 $F_{1}$ ) belongs to solution “A” and the best (or the lowest) objective 2 (or F 2 $F_{2}$ ) belongs to solution “B.” Also, the solutions on the dashed line (including solutions “A” and “B”) are the superior solutions (called Pareto Front solutions). [ 59,60 ] The imaginary ideal solution (which does not actually exist) is made by combining the best characteristics of solutions “A” and “B”, as shown in Figure 6. The solution with the lowest distance from the imaginary ideal solution is chosen as the best trade‐off solution.…”
Section: Problem Definition and Decision‐making Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the solutions on the dashed line (including solutions "A" and "B") are the superior solutions (called Pareto Front solutions). [59,60] The imaginary ideal solution (which does not actually exist) is made by combining the best characteristics of solutions "A" and "B", as shown in Figure 6. The solution with the lowest distance from the imaginary ideal solution is chosen as the best trade-off solution.…”
Section: Decision-making Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its proven capability to optimize several conflicting objectives simultaneously, NSGA-II has been widely used in solving various real-world optimization problems [51,52]. In the current optimization, NSGA-II has also been chosen to optimize the SCO 2 cycles for next-generation SPT plants.…”
Section: Optimization Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%