Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/abf9e1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System understanding as a scientific foundation in radioactive waste disposal, legacy site and decommissioning programmes

Abstract: Ongoing national programmes and International forums have in recent decades developed and enhanced methods and strategies in how to address the characterisation of potentially suitable sites for radioactive waste repositories. Siting processes, site selection and site investigation programmes have been conducted for near surface and geological repositories and plans for construction are in progress or have already been implemented. Lessons learned from these national and international programmes are available … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, general and common strategies related to site and system understanding have been developed in national programmes and reported in international forums, see e.g. DSA (2020) and Lindborg et al (2021). In the next few years, it seems likely that further substantial progress will be made in long-term climate and landscape modelling, e.g.…”
Section: Climate and Site Evolution Modelling Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, general and common strategies related to site and system understanding have been developed in national programmes and reported in international forums, see e.g. DSA (2020) and Lindborg et al (2021). In the next few years, it seems likely that further substantial progress will be made in long-term climate and landscape modelling, e.g.…”
Section: Climate and Site Evolution Modelling Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%