2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.phycom.2023.102007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System throughput maximization in IRS-assisted phase cooperative NOMA networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher than OMA and NOMA Higher spectral efficiency, Complex [13], [20], [84] IRS-OMA Improved BER over OMA Improved over conventional OMA Improved over OMA, Improved energy efficiency,Simple [13], [20], [35], [84] IRS-NOMA User specific performance, improved Improved over conventional NOMA Higher spectral efficiency and energy efficiency, Complex [20], [24], [35], [56] IRS-CNOMA User specific performance, improved Improved over conventional CNOMA Higher spectral efficiency and energy efficiency, More complex multiple IRS units and their multiple links distributed across a wide area. Interference Management: Managing interference between cooperative users and other users in the network can be challenging [69].…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Higher than OMA and NOMA Higher spectral efficiency, Complex [13], [20], [84] IRS-OMA Improved BER over OMA Improved over conventional OMA Improved over OMA, Improved energy efficiency,Simple [13], [20], [35], [84] IRS-NOMA User specific performance, improved Improved over conventional NOMA Higher spectral efficiency and energy efficiency, Complex [20], [24], [35], [56] IRS-CNOMA User specific performance, improved Improved over conventional CNOMA Higher spectral efficiency and energy efficiency, More complex multiple IRS units and their multiple links distributed across a wide area. Interference Management: Managing interference between cooperative users and other users in the network can be challenging [69].…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In traditional point-to-point communication, a sender communicates directly with a receiver. However, in cooperative communication, intermediate nodes, often referred to as relays, assist in transmitting the data from the sender to the receiver [6], [10], [11], [13], [36], [48], [49]. A cooperative communication system model is depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Principle Of Cooperative Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, the artificial intelligence (AI)-driven semantic communication paradigm has received much Given that IRS employs passive reflective elements devoid of signaling methods on received signals, the IRS demonstrates a capacity to reshape signals with minimal overhead [30]. Notably, a substantial body of research has concentrated on unraveling the extensive potential inherent in IRS technology [31][32][33][34][35][36]. The authors in [32] considered the IRS-assisted secure spectrum sharing network, where the IRS can significantly enhance the legal signal and suppress the eavesdropping at the eavesdroppers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that only a limited number of studies have delved into the augmentation of semantic spectrum efficiency (S-SE) for task performance in the context of semantic spectrum sharing networks operating under low signal-to-noise ratios. Furthermore, a majority of the previously mentioned investigations [31,[33][34][35][36] have predominantly relied on conventional methodologies grounded in convex optimization, a less time-efficient paradigm when confronted with the complexities of large-scale connections. Consequently, there exists a compelling imperative to delve into and develop time-efficient intelligent resource allocation schemes [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%