System satisfaction survey for the App to integrate search and augmented reality with geographical information technology

Chiu, Chen-Chiou; Lee, Lai-Chung

doi:10.1007/s00542-017-3333-9

Cited by 17 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As per gender differences in usability for such mobile applications, [8] found no significant disparities. Nevertheless, [34] found that females rated the experience with AR more satisfying and the interaction better and more intuitive than males.…”

Section: Proceedings Of Rochi 2020mentioning

confidence: 81%

“…Carpano [33], Mobile AR guide for tourists [34], TowerAR [9], Virtual/Augmented Gallery [27], Transit Assistant [18], Finnish Outdoor museum [32], Ai Guang Zhan [8], SitCity (proposed framework) [36], MixAR [1], "Deoksugung, in my hands" and DublinAR [16,23], MAR app for Melaka Heritage Sites [38], OvidAR [6], MAR app to revive a demolished Reformed Church in Brașov [5], The Historical Tour Guide [14], 3D model of fortified church [37] x MAR application geo-located and gamified [28], Archaeological park [30], 2 apps: MTL Urban Museum and MetaGuide [13], AR workshops [31] x Open City Museum [17] x x Seraj [7], Millennia Road [26] x…”

Section: Proceedings Of Rochi 2020mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Usability Testing of Mobile Augmented Applications for Cultural Heritage – A Systematic Literature Review

Tiriteu¹,

Vert

2020

RoCHI - International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents an overview of the existing literature to date regarding the usability testing of Mobile Augmented Reality applications developed for cultural heritage. A Systematic Literature Review was conducted with this purpose. Four databases were interrogated with specific keywords. Our of the 88 found research papers, only 31 met the eligibility criteria to be included in this survey. Four major usability testing methods were identified: questionnaires, focus groups, user testing and interviews. The questionnaire method was used in almost all of the studies, and only a few of them combined more usability testing methods. Nearly all papers targeted the outdoors use centered on location-based augmented reality. The perceived ease of use, usefulness and enjoyment were confirmed by a majority of the papers. The ease of use was also correlated to the ease of learning, as well as with the interest of using the application. Cultural heritage is one of the domains that can benefit greatly from the latest improvements in mobile augmented reality technologies.

show abstract

Section: Proceedings Of Rochi 2020mentioning

confidence: 81%

Section: Proceedings Of Rochi 2020mentioning

confidence: 99%

Usability Testing of Mobile Augmented Applications for Cultural Heritage – A Systematic Literature Review

Tiriteu¹,

Vert

2020

RoCHI - International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Los participantes evaluaron el grado de motivación que sintieron interactuando con las escenas aumentadas para completar cada nivel de los juegos. Se utilizó el programa estadístico SPSS (Chiu & Lee, 2018) para procesar todos los datos de los cuestionarios. En la tabla 3 se muestra la tabla de ANOVA generada por el programa SPSS referente a los datos de P1.…”

Section: Análisis De Los Resultados Del Cuestionariounclassified

Untitled

2018

3C TIC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While a total of 60 (57%) authors who used questionnaires as measures, only a handful (12 authors) validated the questionnaires' reliability despite risks of mentioned self-reported biases. Some of the authors who performed reliability measures includes utilization of Cronbach's Alpha [12,14,32,40,42,49,57], Cohen's Kappa [15,24], and Pearson's correlation [15,22]. Techniques such as performance metrics, which are evidently more reliable than self-reported approach were rarely used under the assumption that these processes are much more technical, time-consuming and tedious.…”

Section: Limited Quality Versus Large Sample Convenience (G4)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Usability Measures in Mobile-Based Augmented Reality Learning Applications: A Systematic Review

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The implementation of usability in mobile augmented reality (MAR) learning applications has been utilized in a myriad of standards, methodologies, and techniques. The usage and combination of techniques within research approaches are important in determining the quality of usability data collection. The purpose of this study is to identify, study, and analyze existing usability metrics, methods, techniques, and areas in MAR learning. This study adapts systematic literature review techniques by utilizing research questions and Boolean search strings to identify prospective studies from six established databases that are related to the research context area. Seventy-two articles, consisting of 45 journals, 25 conference proceedings, and two book chapters, were selected through a systematic process. All articles underwent a rigorous selection protocol to ensure content quality according to formulated research questions. Post-synthesis and analysis, the output of this article discusses significant factors in usability-based MAR learning applications. This paper presents five identified gaps in the domain of study, modes of contributions, issues within usability metrics, technique approaches, and hybrid technique combinations. This paper concludes five recommendations based on identified gaps concealing potential of usability-based MAR learning research domains, varieties of unexplored research types, validation of emerging usability metrics, potential of performance metrics, and untapped correlational areas to be discovered.

show abstract

System satisfaction survey for the App to integrate search and augmented reality with geographical information technology

Cited by 17 publications

References 16 publications

Usability Testing of Mobile Augmented Applications for Cultural Heritage – A Systematic Literature Review

Usability Testing of Mobile Augmented Applications for Cultural Heritage – A Systematic Literature Review

Untitled

Usability Measures in Mobile-Based Augmented Reality Learning Applications: A Systematic Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About