2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2010.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System modeling using the Parallel DEVS formalism and the Modelica language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be useful for verification purposes, since the specification of the lower-level SIMAN constructs is much easier to understand than the complex blocks used on the upper level in Arena. And one can go down further: In [17] an essential part of the SIMAN language has been implemented using the PDEVS formalism, thereby providing a sound mathematical formulation of important parts of Arena.…”
Section: Mathematical Foundation Of Simulation Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be useful for verification purposes, since the specification of the lower-level SIMAN constructs is much easier to understand than the complex blocks used on the upper level in Arena. And one can go down further: In [17] an essential part of the SIMAN language has been implemented using the PDEVS formalism, thereby providing a sound mathematical formulation of important parts of Arena.…”
Section: Mathematical Foundation Of Simulation Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge there exist no other approaches that automatically translate Modelica models to the DEVS formalism. Research efforts have been reported that implemented Modelica libraries allowing DEVS models to be formulated within a Modelica environment [1,16], but these approaches require from the users to understand the DEVS framework, as they would have to model their system in the DEVS formalism in order to make use of these libraries.…”
Section: Relevance Of Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last years, numerous interesting and noticeable innovations to enhance aviation safety have been published for different aircraft types. For example, a very small study of developments in the field of aircraft flight envelope protection revealed that 12 different aircraft types or models were used in numerous publications [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Hence, comparison of all the different developments is very difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%