55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting 2017
DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-0321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System-Level Trade Studies for Transonic Transports with Active Flow Control (AFC) Enhanced High-Lift Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the fuel burn may be reduced by 2.25% with an AFC system applied to a simplified high-lift configuration (Hartwich et al 2017), accompanied by an expected noise and drag reduction, once the slat and flap tracks, and the slots between high lift devices and the main element from conventional systems are eliminated (Delfs et al 2017;Lin et al 2019). Assuming that a wing equipped with an AFC system substitutes a single slotted flap for a hinged plain one, the negative effect of weight additions due to the redundancies of the AFC system is compensated by the benefits of the simplification of the flap system (Hartwich et al 2017). Therefore, a configuration with an AFC system is comparable in weight to a single slotted multi-element one.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the fuel burn may be reduced by 2.25% with an AFC system applied to a simplified high-lift configuration (Hartwich et al 2017), accompanied by an expected noise and drag reduction, once the slat and flap tracks, and the slots between high lift devices and the main element from conventional systems are eliminated (Delfs et al 2017;Lin et al 2019). Assuming that a wing equipped with an AFC system substitutes a single slotted flap for a hinged plain one, the negative effect of weight additions due to the redundancies of the AFC system is compensated by the benefits of the simplification of the flap system (Hartwich et al 2017). Therefore, a configuration with an AFC system is comparable in weight to a single slotted multi-element one.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) The massive flow separation on the flap at large deflections limits the lift performance (Aley et al, 2020;Chu et al, 2012), and the Fowler flap has no effective technical measures to eliminate separation; (2) Positions of the flap side edge and external fairing, as well as flow phenomena such as separation vortexes and boundary layer mixing of the main element and flap, are sources of airframe noise (Ma et al, 2020;Zhang, 2010); (3) Retraction/extension mechanisms of the Fowler flap increase both the operating empty weight and cruise excrescence drag. Studies have shown that removing external fairings can reduce the overall cruise drag by up to 3.3 counts (1 count = 0.0001), resulting in fuel savings of 2.25% (Hartwich et al, 2014(Hartwich et al, , 2017.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NASA Advanced Air Transport Technology (AATT) Project is seeking to demonstrate the potential benefits of reducing the cruise drag (and therefore fuel burn) associated with modern high-lift systems without sacrificing aerodynamic and acoustic performance during takeoff and landing operations. One possible approach is to use active flow control (AFC) [2,3] to provide the required low-speed lift performance while reducing the cruise drag associated with the external mechanisms used to deploy a conventional slotted flap (Fowler flap) during high-lift operations [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent system integration study by Hartwich et al [5,6] indicated that up to a 2.25% fuel burn reduction is possible if an AFC-enabled simplified high-lift system (i.e., simple hinged flaps inboard and outboard) could provide the necessary lift at the approach angle of attack. The AFC-related performance gains are primarily due to the 3.3-count excrescence drag reduction from the removal of the external fairings for the Fowler flap mechanism [7] (see Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%