2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3589843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System-level simulation of liquid filling in microfluidic chips

Abstract: Liquid filling in microfluidic channels is a complex process that depends on a variety of geometric, operating, and material parameters such as microchannel geometry, flow velocity/pressure, liquid surface tension, and contact angle of channel surface. Accurate analysis of the filling process can provide key insights into the filling time, air bubble trapping, and dead zone formation, and help evaluate tradeoffs among the various design parameters and lead to optimal chip design. However, efficient modeling of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Owing to the two-phase nature of plasma flow and the microchannel geometry, the optimization process is most conveniently achieved using numerical methods. 22,23) Accordingly, in the present study, the optimal geometry parameters of the two splitter microchannel networks were determined via a series of CFD simulations performed using commercial COMSOL finite element analysis software. Figures 3(a) and 3(b) show the COMSOL models of the U-and Y-shaped splitter microchannels, respectively.…”
Section: Cfd Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the two-phase nature of plasma flow and the microchannel geometry, the optimization process is most conveniently achieved using numerical methods. 22,23) Accordingly, in the present study, the optimal geometry parameters of the two splitter microchannel networks were determined via a series of CFD simulations performed using commercial COMSOL finite element analysis software. Figures 3(a) and 3(b) show the COMSOL models of the U-and Y-shaped splitter microchannels, respectively.…”
Section: Cfd Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It divides the development of microfluidics over the past 40 years into three waves, dictated by the fabrication technology as mechanical micromaching, cleanroom fabrication and rapid prototyping [14]. In order to further understand the processes of liquid flows, powerful commercial software, such as CFD-ACE + , ANSYS Fluent and COMSOL Multiphysics, are usually employed to the study of details of liquid motion in the microfluidic channels [15][16][17][18]. However, due to the long time involved in simulation of micro fluid motion using the commercial software, mixed methodology simulations have been developed and are being employed for the integrated system with very fast speed and acceptable accuracy [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development of complex capillary-driven microfluidic networks is challenging without the use of suitable modeling techniques. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been used to model capillary-driven flows in detail using the volume-of-fluid method (VOF) [6][7][8][9]. However, CFD using VOF requires high computational power and is practically intractable for large capillary-driven systems where a fine mesh is often needed to resolve an interface that is moving through the computational domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, CFD using VOF requires high computational power and is practically intractable for large capillary-driven systems where a fine mesh is often needed to resolve an interface that is moving through the computational domain. Simplified modeling techniques using electric circuit analogy have been shown to offer both a high level of accuracy in predicting the interface position as a function of time and computational efficiency (several orders of magnitude faster than predictions from CFD using VOF) [7,8,[10][11][12][13]. However, the proposed models using electric circuit analogy are primarily developed for single-phase flow and simplified systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%