System identification of cropped delta UAVs from flight test methods using particle Swarm-Optimisation-based estimation

Abstract

In the era of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS), an onboard autopilot occupies a prominent place and is inevitable for many of their modern applications. The efficacy of autopilot heavily relies upon the accuracy of the sensors employed and the capability of the onboard flight controller. In general, aerodynamic behaviour and flight dynamic capabilities of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) govern the selection and the design of flight controllers. Precise modeling of linear aerodynamic characteristics from flight data can be achieved using many of the existing classical parameter estimation techniques such as Output Error Method (OEM), Equation Error Method (EEM), and Filter Error Method (FEM). However, all the classical methods may not be readily applicable for aerodynamic modeling in nonlinear flight envelopes. The current manuscript is an attempt to exploit the capabilities of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) technique, named Particle Swarm Optimisation (PSO), in combination with Least Squares (LS) cost function to perform linear as well as nonlinear aerodynamic parameter estimation. The aforementioned task is accomplished by considering flight data from manoeuvers pertaining to linear angles of attack, moderate and near stall flight envelopes of two different UAVs with cropped delta planform geometry. Parameters estimated using the proposed LS-PSO method are consistent with minimum standard deviation and are on a par with OEM estimates. The proposed LS-PSO method enhances the capabilities of LS-based EEM while estimating stall characteristic parameters, which was not possible with LS alone. The longitudinal and lateral-directional static parameters estimated from the full-scale wind tunnel testing of the two UAVs were also used to corroborate the results obtained from the flight data using the LS-PSO method.

Parametric model identification of delta wing UAVs using filter error method augmented with particle swarm optimisation

“…In this research, the values of c 1 and c 2 are chosen to be 2 as given in [32]. The value of w is chosen to decrease with each iteration by the rule w(t + 1) = 0.99 w(t) to encourage the particles to follow the optimal direction as given in [36]. a 1 and a 2 in Equation ( 26) are random vectors of appropriate dimensions.…”