32nd Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference 1991
DOI: 10.2514/6.1991-950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System identification methods for dynamic structural models of electronic packages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Minimize: = 0.5 mv 2 (8) where KEij is the kinetic energy associated with the /th degree of freedom in the yth mode shape, and M/* is the term in the /th row and £th column of the mass matrix. The comparison of the kinetic energy matrix terms KE^ between the calculations using the analysis and test mode shapes provides information about the mass distribution and the modal amplitudes at each degree of freedom.…”
Section: Energy Checks For Location Of Modeling Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minimize: = 0.5 mv 2 (8) where KEij is the kinetic energy associated with the /th degree of freedom in the yth mode shape, and M/* is the term in the /th row and £th column of the mass matrix. The comparison of the kinetic energy matrix terms KE^ between the calculations using the analysis and test mode shapes provides information about the mass distribution and the modal amplitudes at each degree of freedom.…”
Section: Energy Checks For Location Of Modeling Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity methods make use of sensitivity derivatives of modal parameters with respect to physical design variables [14][15][16] or with respect to matrix element variables [17]. The derivatives are then used in various formulations to update the physical parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical constraints may include satisfaction of the eigenproblem for all measured modes, definiteness of the updated property matrices, and preservation of the original sparsity pattern. Sensitivity methods for model refinement make use of sensitivity derivatives of modal parameters with respect to either physical design variables (Martinez et al, 1991) or matrix element variables (Matzen, 1987). When physical parameters are varied, the updated model is consistent within the original finite element method framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%