2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System dynamics modeling for sustainable supply chain management: A literature review and systems thinking approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
98
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
98
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we investigated how the social sustainability dimension impacts the economic sustainability dimension. To understand this impact profoundly with the main focus on the social sustainability dimension of supply chains, we divided the social sustainability practices identified by Sudusinghe et al [28] (as mentioned in Table 1) into two aspects from the perspective of a manufacturing firm as "internally influencing social sustainability practices" (ISSP) and "externally influencing social sustainability practices" (ESSP), aligning with the categorization of social sustainability practices of Rentizelas et al [55] and Rebs et al [56]. This categorization is outlined in Tables 1 and 2. • ISSP construct focuses on the practices that majorly create an impact on the human factor (employees and workers) inside the company, such as improving education, working conditions, etc.…”
Section: Development Of Hypotheses and Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we investigated how the social sustainability dimension impacts the economic sustainability dimension. To understand this impact profoundly with the main focus on the social sustainability dimension of supply chains, we divided the social sustainability practices identified by Sudusinghe et al [28] (as mentioned in Table 1) into two aspects from the perspective of a manufacturing firm as "internally influencing social sustainability practices" (ISSP) and "externally influencing social sustainability practices" (ESSP), aligning with the categorization of social sustainability practices of Rentizelas et al [55] and Rebs et al [56]. This categorization is outlined in Tables 1 and 2. • ISSP construct focuses on the practices that majorly create an impact on the human factor (employees and workers) inside the company, such as improving education, working conditions, etc.…”
Section: Development Of Hypotheses and Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We proposed an implementation framework consisting of three broad strategic responses (namely reactive, cooperative, and dynamic), which represent firms' business priorities and their underlying strategic mindsets. The conception of reactive, cooperative, and dynamic strategies was grounded on prior SSCM literature, including that of Azevedo et al [29], Markman and Krause [33], Rebs et al [34], and Walker and Jones [35]. These responses vary in the strategic intent of organizations ranging from passivity to increasing activeness as well as in complexity from less to more complicated levels.…”
Section: The Categories and Practices Of Sscm Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There seems to be a limited research concerning inventory system dynamic (ISD) studies, thus there is potential to address multiple unexplored research gaps [19]. The challenge then is to find a purposeful gap to address, and justifying why system dynamics (SD) methodology would be more appropriate over methods that allow for more quantitative accuracy and optimization.…”
Section: Inventory System Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the approach taken by studies seeking to apply the SD framework in a specific context. On the other hand, in studies that assess the methodology itself, SD has been coupled with various methods to augment its lack of numerical soundness, and the lack of perspective in other modeling approaches [19].…”
Section: Inventory System Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation