2001 IEEE/IFIP International Symposium on Integrated Network Management Proceedings. Integrated Network Management VII. Integra
DOI: 10.1109/inm.2001.918012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System designs for adaptive, distributed network monitoring and control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After a test node is chosen, the observation for this test may take advantage of the traditional SNMP paradigm by polling appropriate MIB variables; or, delegated (mobile) agents could be sent to the network elements to collect the data by using the management by delegation paradigm [7][9]. As one example of such an agent-based environment, the authors presented in [26] a couple of system designs for adaptive, distributed network monitoring and control, and in a sister paper also submitted to this conference [27], the authors discuss in more details the idea of change of logic. Further, the managed system could be divided into domains [33], and for each domain we could assign such an "intelligent" module that take charge of the fault and performance management for it [2][25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a test node is chosen, the observation for this test may take advantage of the traditional SNMP paradigm by polling appropriate MIB variables; or, delegated (mobile) agents could be sent to the network elements to collect the data by using the management by delegation paradigm [7][9]. As one example of such an agent-based environment, the authors presented in [26] a couple of system designs for adaptive, distributed network monitoring and control, and in a sister paper also submitted to this conference [27], the authors discuss in more details the idea of change of logic. Further, the managed system could be divided into domains [33], and for each domain we could assign such an "intelligent" module that take charge of the fault and performance management for it [2][25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have allowed device extensibility through call-back hooks and delegation of mobile agents [27] and Pluggable Service Device Models (PSDM) for abstraction of vendor/technology specifics [28]. Some systems also support evolutive Command Line Interfaces (CLIs) across a range of devices, such as the Lucent IP Network Configurator [29] and IP-CLIX [30].…”
Section: Evolutive Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%