2011 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/biocas.2011.6107744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

System considerations for the compressive sampling of EEG and ECoG bio-signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here it used the same block partition as BSBL-BO. The second was an ℓ 1 algorithm used in [4] to recover EEG. The parameters of the two algorithms were tuned for optimal results.…”
Section: A Experiments 1: Compressed Sensing With Dctmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here it used the same block partition as BSBL-BO. The second was an ℓ 1 algorithm used in [4] to recover EEG. The parameters of the two algorithms were tuned for optimal results.…”
Section: A Experiments 1: Compressed Sensing With Dctmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown in [3] that compared to wavelet compression, Compressed Sensing (CS), when using sparse binary matrices as its sensing matrices, can reduce energy consumption while achieving competitive data compression ratio. Besides, the use of sparse binary matrices means the device cost can be largely reduced [3], [4]. However, current CS algorithms only work well for sparse signals or signals with sparse representation coefficients in some transformed domains (e.g., the wavelet domain).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author argued that chirped Gabor dictionary would be very efficient and it can increase the sparsity of the signals; hence, it improves the performance of CS-based EEG monitoring. On the other hand, Gangopadhyay et al claimed in [14] that wavelet-based dictionaries are more suitable for CS-based EEG compression than the previously mentioned approaches. Author in [11] have provided a detailed performance study for six different sparsifying dictionaries, namely, Gabor, Mexican Hat, cubic Spline, linear Spline, cubic B-Spline, and linear B-Spline.…”
Section: Cs-based Eeg Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a great attention was dedicated to providing dictionaries and basis that render a high sparse representation of EEG signals. Subsequently, several dictionaries have been investigated in the literature such as Slepian basis, Gabor frames, and DWT matrices [12][13][14][15]28]. In [12], Senay et al quantified a CS framework for EEG compression using Slepian functions as a sparsifying dictionary.…”
Section: Cs-based Eeg Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation