SYRMA: a tool for a system approach to risk management in mission critical systems

Bernardini, Gionni; Paganelli, Federica; Manetti, Mauro; Fantechi, Alessandro; Iadanza, Ernesto

doi:10.1504/ijbis.2013.054166

Cited by 10 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Using verbal descriptors (low, medium, or high), 26 risk weights, 25,34,38,49,59,61 encoding, 30,40,52,60,61 scoring tables, [25][26][27]30,32,37 Bayesian methods, 46 Monte Carlo method, 46,60 and historical data, 49 suggested for estimating the severity and probability of risk in executive levels of HCOs.…”

Section: Risk Estimation (Severity and Consequences And Likelihood Esmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Present-estimated risks based on risk presentation formats, included a single number index (e.g. 1/100,000), 27,37 use failure space vs success space, 54 fuzzy numbers scales, 30,32,40,41,52,61 tables (e.g. sizes or bands of fatalities are 1-10, 11-100, and 101-1000), 30,40 risk matrix, 25,33,43,52,53,57 graphs or diagrams (e.g.…”

Section: Risk Presentationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This step concerned with making decisions about prioritization and comparison of risks to be managed, based on the outcomes of risk analysis. 27 A simple method for risk filtering was a Pareto analysis. 26,30,58,60 Moreover, in some studies, decision tree, 25,28,49,57 priority matrix, 25,30,35 criticality matrix, 34,44 Criticality scale, 34,38,49,60 and risk prioritization grid used to determine acceptable and unacceptable risks.…”

Section: Compare Estimated Risks Against the Risk Criteria And Priorimentioning

confidence: 99%

“…26,30,58,60 Moreover, in some studies, decision tree, 25,28,49,57 priority matrix, 25,30,35 criticality matrix, 34,44 Criticality scale, 34,38,49,60 and risk prioritization grid used to determine acceptable and unacceptable risks. 27 Furthermore, simple additive weighting (SAW), 32 and hazard totem pole (HTP) 60 methods can be used as practical and quantitative methods for risk evaluation. SAW was a simple and most applicable multi-attribute decision method which is known as a weighted linear combination or scoring technique.…”

Section: Compare Estimated Risks Against the Risk Criteria And Priorimentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

<p>Risk Management in Executive Levels of Healthcare Organizations: Insights from a Scoping Review (2018)</p>

Ferdosi

Rezayatmand

Taleghani

2020

RMHP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: This study attempted to present a framework and appropriate techniques for implementing risk management (RM) in executive levels of healthcare organizations (HCOs) and grasping new future research opportunities in this field. Methods: A scoping review was conducted of all English language studies, from January 2000 to October 2018 in the main bibliographic databases. Review selection and characterization were performed by two independent reviewers using pretested forms. Results: Following a keyword search and an assessment of fit for this review, 37 studies were analyzed. Based on the findings and considering the ISO31000 model, a comprehensive yet simple framework of risk management is developed for the executive levels of HCOs. It includes five main phases: establishing the context, risk assessment, risk treatment, monitoring and review, and communication and consultation. A set of tools and techniques were also suggested for use at each phase. Also, the status of risk management in the executive levels of HCOs was determined based on the proposed framework. Conclusion: The framework can be used as a training tool to guide in effective risk assessment as well as a tool to assess non-clinical risks of healthcare organizations. Managers of healthcare organizations who seek to ensure high quality should use a range of risk management methods and tools in their organizations, based on their need, and not assume that each tool is comprehensive.

show abstract

Section: Risk Estimation (Severity and Consequences And Likelihood Esmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Risk Presentationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Compare Estimated Risks Against the Risk Criteria And Priorimentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Compare Estimated Risks Against the Risk Criteria And Priorimentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

<p>Risk Management in Executive Levels of Healthcare Organizations: Insights from a Scoping Review (2018)</p>

Ferdosi

Rezayatmand

Taleghani

2020

RMHP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In clinical risk management, a relevant role is played not only by the analysis of adverse events, but also the analysis of the so called "near misses", i.e. unplanned events that did not result in injury, illness or damage, but had the potential to do so [5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A distributed approach to Complex Event Processing in RFID-enabled hospitals

Zappia

Ciofi

Paganelli

et al. 2014

2014 Euro Med Telco Conference (EMTC)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article we adopt the Complex Event Processing (CEP) approach for the management of information related to patients status in the context of RFID-enabled hospitals. Our main objective is to support clinical risk management by combining data from different RFID-based appliances used to monitor patient identification, patient tracking and drugs administration control. We propose a distributed system that directly embodies essential CEP principles such as event abstraction, event aggregation and event transformation to offer a hierarchical and distributed architecture where CEP capabilities are supplied by processing nodes. Events flowing through the system levels are progressively aggregated and refined in order to produce a global scoped information. In addition, we introduce specific events patterns aimed at identifying possible dangerous patient conditions.

show abstract

Health Technology Assessment of Medical Devices in Low and Middle Income Countries: study design and preliminary results.

Pecchia

2017

IFMBE Proceedings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SYRMA: a tool for a system approach to risk management in mission critical systems

Cited by 10 publications

References 18 publications

<p>Risk Management in Executive Levels of Healthcare Organizations: Insights from a Scoping Review (2018)</p>

<p>Risk Management in Executive Levels of Healthcare Organizations: Insights from a Scoping Review (2018)</p>

A distributed approach to Complex Event Processing in RFID-enabled hospitals

Health Technology Assessment of Medical Devices in Low and Middle Income Countries: study design and preliminary results.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About