2009
DOI: 10.3814/2009/176837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Syringocystadenocarcinoma Papilliferum In Situ: Case Report with Immunohistochemical Observations

Abstract: A 23-year-old man was operated for a skin tumor in the right axilla. Histological examination revealed findings consistent with a syringocystadenoma papilliferum. However, most of the papillary structures showed a disorganized proliferation of atypical cells without invasive growth, that is, a syringocystadenocarcinoma papilliferum in situ. Immunohistochemistry disclosed a different staining profile between the basal cells of the papillary structures and those of the columnar and atypical cells which reacted s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SCACP differs from SCAAP and SCAAP IN SITU by infiltration of tumour cells into deep dermis or subcutaneous fat. SCACP and SCAAP IN SITU differ from SCAAP by cytological features of tumour cells characterized by higher nuclear cytoplasmic ratio, nuclear irregularity, coarse chromatin and increased mitotic activity [1,3,6]. Though there is no definitive immunohistochemical profile for a SCACP, the strong expression of CK7, CEA and GCFDP-15 supports the apocrine differentiation of the neoplasm [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SCACP differs from SCAAP and SCAAP IN SITU by infiltration of tumour cells into deep dermis or subcutaneous fat. SCACP and SCAAP IN SITU differ from SCAAP by cytological features of tumour cells characterized by higher nuclear cytoplasmic ratio, nuclear irregularity, coarse chromatin and increased mitotic activity [1,3,6]. Though there is no definitive immunohistochemical profile for a SCACP, the strong expression of CK7, CEA and GCFDP-15 supports the apocrine differentiation of the neoplasm [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Syringocystadenoma papilliferum is concurrent with apocrine hidrocystoma and emerges from multi-potent, undifferentiated cells which sequentially differentiate towards the dual cellular genealogy. Syringocystadenoma papilliferum is probably the sole neoplasm which triggers the differentiation of primeval cells into an apocrine hidrocystoma [3,4]. Syringocystadenoma papilliferum delineates sebaceous induction, a phenomenon which is usually cogitated in lesions such as dermatofibroma and melanocytic nevi.Sebaceous induction elucidated in Syringocystadenoma papilliferum is essentially defined as the occurrence of two or more rudimentary sebaceous glands enveloping extraneous zones of the cutaneous lesion in the absence of a normal hair follicle.…”
Section: Disease Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the aetiology is obscure, mechanics of sebaceous induction involves pleuri-potent cells composing immature sebaceous articulations at a specific anatomic site, growth factors secreted by contingent lesions such as a dermatofibroma, apocrine hidrocystoma or Syringocystadenoma papilliferum, a cogent alteration of micro-environment, ectopic hedgehog signalling and declining mobilization of β catenin [4,5]. Undifferentiated, peripherally arranged sebocytes are intensely immune reactive to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the pertinent molecule (EGFR) with specific ligands are implicated in the differentiation of sebocytes and efficient lipogenesis.…”
Section: Disease Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations