2014
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies

Abstract: BackgroundSystematic Reviews (SRs) of experimental animal studies are not yet common practice, but awareness of the merits of conducting such SRs is steadily increasing. As animal intervention studies differ from randomized clinical trials (RCT) in many aspects, the methodology for SRs of clinical trials needs to be adapted and optimized for animal intervention studies. The Cochrane Collaboration developed a Risk of Bias (RoB) tool to establish consistency and avoid discrepancies in assessing the methodologica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
2,041
0
9

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,438 publications
(2,226 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(28 reference statements)
4
2,041
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…If there is any addition or exclusion, it should be noted with suitable reasons. On the other hand, we also agree with Hooijmans et al [77] that the registration of all animal studies should be more common and their protocols should be published in accessible databases with the hope of improving the standards of these studies. Thereby, further studies in humans would be more accurate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If there is any addition or exclusion, it should be noted with suitable reasons. On the other hand, we also agree with Hooijmans et al [77] that the registration of all animal studies should be more common and their protocols should be published in accessible databases with the hope of improving the standards of these studies. Thereby, further studies in humans would be more accurate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The methodological quality of included animal studies was assessed (▶ Table 4) by using criteria from SYRCLEʼs tool [77]. This tool contains 10 items: sequence generation (selection bias), baseline characteristics (selection bias), allocation concealment (selection bias), random housing (performance bias), blinding (performance bias), random outcome assessment (detection bias), blinding (detection bias), incomplete outcome data (attrition bias), selective outcome reporting (reporting bias), and other sources of bias (other bias).…”
Section: Methodsological Quality Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To access the risk of bias of RCTs, the Cochrane Collaboration has developed the Cochrane RoB Tool (41). Systematic reviews of experimental animal studies are not yet common practice, and just recently the SYstematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation has presented a SYRCLE's RoB Tool for animal studies (42). The SYRCLE's RoB Tool is based on the Cochrane RoB Tool and has been adjusted for the aspects of bias known to play a role in animal intervention studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the papers found from the literature survey, the published papers discussing the improvement of standards of reporting in animal studies, 10-13 a recently introduced RoB tool 14 and CAMARADES checklist 15 were selected to develop the initial questionnaire. By excluding the therapeutic variables from the proposed items in the aforementioned papers, a 47-item checklist was developed (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%