1992
DOI: 10.1177/095646249200300601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Syphilis: New Diagnostic Directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
9

Year Published

1994
1994
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 145 publications
0
44
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…It is likely that most of the TPPA-nonreactive, EIA-reactive cases were either old or treated cases of mostly HIV-positive patients. Aberrant results in laboratory tests for syphilis are well known to occur in HIV-infected individuals (15,20). We would, therefore, not advocate that syphilis confirmation algorithms change but rather highlight the fact that in repeatedly screened populations, such as HIV-positive individuals, discrepancies between treponemal EIA and TPPA results are quite prevalent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is likely that most of the TPPA-nonreactive, EIA-reactive cases were either old or treated cases of mostly HIV-positive patients. Aberrant results in laboratory tests for syphilis are well known to occur in HIV-infected individuals (15,20). We would, therefore, not advocate that syphilis confirmation algorithms change but rather highlight the fact that in repeatedly screened populations, such as HIV-positive individuals, discrepancies between treponemal EIA and TPPA results are quite prevalent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manavi and colleagues (16) have suggested that, in the absence of a specific treponemal IgM EIA, a TPPA test should be performed whenever there (Table 3). Traditionally, the FTA-ABS test is regarded as the "gold standard" for confirmatory syphilis serology (2,20). Reservations have been expressed (6) that when sensitive treponemal EIAs are used for screening, the FTA-ABS test may fail to confirm the screening reactivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the serological tests in the diagnosis of congenital syphilis are confused by transferred antibodies from a syphilitic mother to her child. Direct methods of syphilis diagnosis involving microscopic identification of treponemes in clinical samples or rabbit infectivity tests (RIT) are suboptimal because of low sensitivity and low specificity (microscopy), or because of costly and delayed test results [4]. In addition, neither test can distinguish between syphilis and endemic treponematoses; nor can they distinguish between different T. pallidum strains and therefore cannot differentiate between re-infection and reactivation of syphilis and cannot be used for epidemiological studies.…”
Section: Limitations Of Present Laboratory Tests For Syphilismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, serology has several limitations including a delayed antibody response, which usually appears first during the second week of infection. With the exception of specific anti-treponemal IgM tests [4], positive routine serology of syphilis does not indicate an active infection process because a previous history of syphilitic infection is detected at the same time. Interpretation of serological tests in patients in geographical areas with the occurrence of endemic treponematoses is often quite complex.…”
Section: Limitations Of Present Laboratory Tests For Syphilismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…L'association du TPHA et du VDRL (ou RPR) permet de dépister une syphilis primaire ou secondaire avec une sensibilité de 84 % [56]. L'immunofluorescence indirecte ou FTA-abs.…”
Section: Les Tests De Dépistageunclassified