2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2018.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthetic transmit aperture beamforming for sound velocity estimation using channel-domain differential phase gradient – A phantom study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because, when the received channel data comes from a large sample volume due to unfocused transmission, the corresponding phase curve would have a reduced curvature due to the superimposition of several diffuse scatterers in the lateral direction [29]. This phenomenon is in agreement with other pre-beamforming SOS estimation methods such as in [15][16][17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is because, when the received channel data comes from a large sample volume due to unfocused transmission, the corresponding phase curve would have a reduced curvature due to the superimposition of several diffuse scatterers in the lateral direction [29]. This phenomenon is in agreement with other pre-beamforming SOS estimation methods such as in [15][16][17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The minimum average phase variance method is to calculate the minimal phase variances of channel signal using different C beam to determine the C opt [15]. The phase variance can be also represented in the form of channel differential phase gradient between left and right sub-apertures [16,17]. On the other hand, the channel autocorrelation function of different C beam with the largest area under curve also correspond to the C opt [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%