GLOBECOM 2022 - 2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference 2022
DOI: 10.1109/globecom48099.2022.10001157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthetic Traffic Generation with Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results indicated that the distribution of the generated samples was very close to the real ones. Furthermore, the Frechet Traffic Distance (FTD) score indicated that the distribution of synthetically generated data was, also, very close to other random distributions [13].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results indicated that the distribution of the generated samples was very close to the real ones. Furthermore, the Frechet Traffic Distance (FTD) score indicated that the distribution of synthetically generated data was, also, very close to other random distributions [13].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Moreover, it achieved a better scalability-fidelity trade-off compared to other existing solutions [12]. In a similar direction, Wu et al [13] proposed the Synthetic Packet Traffic Generative Adversarial Network (SPATGAN) approach. The SPATGAN framework consisted of a server agent and a client agent to simulate/mimic the exchange of packets over a network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…They either emulate traffic patterns using probability distributions, which may not accurately represent real-world packet traffic, or they require an extensive setup of targeted applications with user modeling, which can be a challenging and time-consuming process. Wu et al [20] point out that while some traffic generators offer advanced distributions that account for bursty traffic and anomalies, the actual bottleneck is that packet lengths in real-life network traffic are categorical (i.e., limited to specific values or ranges like IP addresses and port numbers), not continuous. Categorical data refers to data that can be divided into distinct categories or bins, while continuous values are those that can take any value within a given range.…”
Section: A Chronological Survey Of Network Traffic Generatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%