2020
DOI: 10.1111/febs.15346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthetic post‐translational modifications of elongation factor P using the ligase EpmA

Abstract: Canonically, tRNA synthetases charge tRNA. However, the lysyl-tRNA synthetase paralog EpmA catalyzes the attachment of (R)-b-lysine to the eamino group of lysine 34 of the translation elongation factor P (EF-P) in Escherichia coli. This modification is essential for EF-P-mediated translational rescue of ribosomes stalled at consecutive prolines. In this study, we determined the kinetics of EpmA and its variant EpmA_A298G to catalyze the post-translational modification of K34 in EF-P with eight noncanonical sub… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This cannot necessarily be expected, as the E. coli endogenous EF-P significantly differs from its pseudomonal counterpart 25 : although both proteins alleviate ribosome stalling at polyproline stretches 6 , 26 , their modes of activation are phylogenetically unrelated 6 , 27 . While E. coli EF-P (EF-P Eco ) strictly depends on ( R )-β-lysylation 22 , 28 30 and hydroxylation 31 of a conserved lysine, Pseudomonas EF-P (EF-P Ppu ) is rhamnosylated at an arginine by the glycosyltransferase EarP (EarP Ppu ) at the structurally equivalent position 6 , 21 . Despite these apparent distinct post-translational modifications, a combination of efp Ppu and earP Ppu from P. putida KT2440 can compensate for a lack of efp in E. coli (Δ efp ) as long as the endogenous dTDP- l -Rha pathway remains intact (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cannot necessarily be expected, as the E. coli endogenous EF-P significantly differs from its pseudomonal counterpart 25 : although both proteins alleviate ribosome stalling at polyproline stretches 6 , 26 , their modes of activation are phylogenetically unrelated 6 , 27 . While E. coli EF-P (EF-P Eco ) strictly depends on ( R )-β-lysylation 22 , 28 30 and hydroxylation 31 of a conserved lysine, Pseudomonas EF-P (EF-P Ppu ) is rhamnosylated at an arginine by the glycosyltransferase EarP (EarP Ppu ) at the structurally equivalent position 6 , 21 . Despite these apparent distinct post-translational modifications, a combination of efp Ppu and earP Ppu from P. putida KT2440 can compensate for a lack of efp in E. coli (Δ efp ) as long as the endogenous dTDP- l -Rha pathway remains intact (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for hydroxylation, none of the modification steps can be bypassed without noticeable effects on translational rescue of PP-proteins. Even modification of EF-P with α-lysine instead of ß-lysine decreases its activity 38 . Notably, the absence of modification in EF-P impairs the translation of polyproline-containing proteins 9 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have employed a range of techniques, including ribosome profiling, mass spectrometry, in vitro and in vivo reporter systems, to identify motifs associated with different degrees of ribosome pausing 14,16,[37][38][39][40][41] . The majority of these studies focuses on motifs which contain at least two prolines, as EF-P is well known to support their synthesis during the transpeptidation reaction 16,38 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%