1991
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.29.10.2253-2258.1991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthetic peptide-based immunoassays for distinguishing between human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I and type II infections in seropositive individuals

Abstract: Until now, serologic tests that distinguish the closely related human T-cell lymphotropic virus types I (HTLV-I) and II (HTLV-II) infections have not been available. Synthetic peptide assays, employing peptides derived from the core and envelope proteins of HTLV-I and HTLV-II (SynthEIA and Select-HTLV tests), were evaluated for the ability to serologically discriminate HTLV-I and HTLV-II infections. Of 32 HTLV-Iand 57 HTLV-II-positive serum specimens from individuals whose infections were confirmed by polymera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the sensitivity of recent HTLV‐I EIAs for HTLV‐II antibody is controversial, particularly as evidence accumulates that HTLV‐II is not benign 12,14 . WB assays, particularly those incorporating a recombinant envelope protein (rgp21e) 16 or/and the HTLV‐I‐ and HTLV‐II‐specific recombinant proteins MTA‐1 and K55, respectively, 17 or HTLV‐I and ‐II type‐specific synthetic peptides, 18 are both sensitive and specific but impractical for screening larger numbers of samples. In the United States, the WB has been used for supplemental or confirmatory testing of samples with positive screening results on EIAs, 15 but the lack of Food and Drug Administration licensure of HTLV WBs has recently limited their use.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the sensitivity of recent HTLV‐I EIAs for HTLV‐II antibody is controversial, particularly as evidence accumulates that HTLV‐II is not benign 12,14 . WB assays, particularly those incorporating a recombinant envelope protein (rgp21e) 16 or/and the HTLV‐I‐ and HTLV‐II‐specific recombinant proteins MTA‐1 and K55, respectively, 17 or HTLV‐I and ‐II type‐specific synthetic peptides, 18 are both sensitive and specific but impractical for screening larger numbers of samples. In the United States, the WB has been used for supplemental or confirmatory testing of samples with positive screening results on EIAs, 15 but the lack of Food and Drug Administration licensure of HTLV WBs has recently limited their use.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant homologies of the transmembrane proteins of all known retroviruses may account for the false-positive rates. On the other hand, the r2lenv reactivity recently been utilized for serologic differentiation of HTLV-I abeys, and 3 of 4 from HTLV-II (16,17). Our analysis of these STLV- (22).…”
Section: * Gmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Synthetic-peptide-based immunoassay. A synthetic-peptide-based immunoassay (Select-HTLV; Coulter Immunology) which discriminates between HTLV-I and HTLV-II infection was performed as previously described (16). Briefly, wells coated with synthetic peptide (HTLV-I-specific p199a9 and HTLV-II-specific gp52enV) were incubated with 100 ,u1 of test serum at a 1:50 dilution and incubated at room temperature for 30 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The discriminatory serological tests are themselves based on research into antibodies produced to combat specific epitopes of each HTLV type. For this reason, immunonenzymatic assays, which contain synthetic peptides which are type-specific antigens, 4 or Western blot modified assays, which incorporate recombinant antigens which are type-specific to viral lysate, 5 are used. However, it should be remarked that, in some cases, even the discriminatory serological tests are not always capable of identifying the type of HTLV responsible for the infection, which makes it more difficult to provide individuals with the appropriate medical advice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%