2019
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.10.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthetic Neoepitopes of the Transglutaminase–Deamidated Gliadin Complex as Biomarkers for Diagnosing and Monitoring Celiac Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A combination of aDGP tests led to a sensitivity of 77.8% and a negative predictive value of 91.8%. One study found 87% sensitivity and 89% specificity of aDGP IgG for prediction of nonresponsive CD[ 6 ], while another study found only 48% sensitivity but 91% specificity of aDGP IgA for prediction of persistent VA[ 7 ]. The wide use of aDGP in future studies may contribute to a more precise role of it in detection of VA despite GFD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A combination of aDGP tests led to a sensitivity of 77.8% and a negative predictive value of 91.8%. One study found 87% sensitivity and 89% specificity of aDGP IgG for prediction of nonresponsive CD[ 6 ], while another study found only 48% sensitivity but 91% specificity of aDGP IgA for prediction of persistent VA[ 7 ]. The wide use of aDGP in future studies may contribute to a more precise role of it in detection of VA despite GFD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is not much data on anti-deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies (aDGP). There is one study evaluating aDGP as a reliable marker of persistent VA[ 6 ], while another study found only 48% sensitivity and 91% specificity of aDGP IgA for predicting persistent VA[ 7 ]. Currently, to the best of our knowledge, there are no studies indicating the absolute necessity of routine follow-up biopsy[ 8 , 9 ]; however, many centers recommend its implementation[ 9 , 10 ] and itis considered as an important tool in the follow-up of symptomatic patients with CD, based on the recommendations by the American Gastroenterology Association[ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related research into tTG’s role in celiac disease has been quite active as well. Many studies have focused upon tTG antibodies, and crosslinked gliadin, as diagnostic tools [55,56] . Others have investigated systems in which activated tTG might be inhibited to model celiac disease, with one example being Caco-2 intestinal cancer cells, which express crosslinking-competent tTG on their surface [57,58] .…”
Section: Several Roles Of Ttg In Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…TGM2 deamidates Gln (Q) to Glu (E) in the gliadin which increases its affinity to the HLA‐DQ2 or HLA‐DQ8 molecules on antigen‐presenting cells 1 . Then antibodies against TGM2, gliadin, cross‐linked TGM2‐gliadin (called neoepitope) and actin develop through unclear mechanisms 1,9 . The epitopes of TGA and the biological effects of TGA have been intensively investigated, 8 while the TGG epitopes have never been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The epitopes of TGA and the biological effects of TGA have been intensively investigated, 8 while the TGG epitopes have never been investigated. Recently, anti‐neoepitope Abs are also being used to screen CD demonstrating that TGM2 not only deamidates gliadin but also crosslinks gliadin to TGM2 9 . Although TGM2‐Abs are present in most CD patients, they are also found in non‐CD individuals with inflammatory bowel disease, viral infections, or end‐stage heart failure 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%