2020
DOI: 10.1049/iet-ipr.2020.1141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthetic medical image generator for data augmentation and anonymisation based on generative adversarial network for glioblastoma tumors growth prediction

Abstract: Prediction methods of glioblastoma tumours growth constitute a hard task due to the lack of medical data, which is mostly related to the patients' privacy, the cost of collecting a large medical data set, and the availability of related notations by experts.In this study, the authors propose a synthetic medical image generator (SMIG) with the purpose of generating synthetic data based on the generative adversarial network in order to provide anonymised data. In addition, to predict the glioblastoma multiform t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 , incorporate an indirect evaluation of the generated images. Additionally, seventeen [ 38 , 46 – 49 , 54 – 57 , 60 , 67 , 69 , 75 , 78 , 79 , 81 , 92 ] of these studies visualize a selection of the synthetic samples, and thirteen [ 39 , 41 , 42 , 44 , 58 , 66 , 68 , 82 , 83 , 85 , 89 91 ] were qualitatively evaluated by experienced clinicians, as illustrated in Fig. 11 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…10 , incorporate an indirect evaluation of the generated images. Additionally, seventeen [ 38 , 46 – 49 , 54 – 57 , 60 , 67 , 69 , 75 , 78 , 79 , 81 , 92 ] of these studies visualize a selection of the synthetic samples, and thirteen [ 39 , 41 , 42 , 44 , 58 , 66 , 68 , 82 , 83 , 85 , 89 91 ] were qualitatively evaluated by experienced clinicians, as illustrated in Fig. 11 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different strategies to mitigate the limited population of the original dataset, including subsampling of examinations at a slice level (from 3D volume to 2D slices, twenty-six studies) [ 38 , 39 , 41 , 42 , 44 , 47 – 50 , 54 , 55 , 57 , 58 , 60 , 66 – 69 , 75 , 77 , 79 , 81 – 84 , 88 ] and at a patch level (from tumor to sub-regions of the tumor, seven studies) [ 56 , 72 , 78 , 85 , 89 91 ]. These subsampling techniques can result in the loss of key features of tumor heterogeneity, significant voxel-based and spatial information with morphological features such as sphericity, shape and volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations