1985
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3011.1985.tb01015.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthetic homo‐oligomethionine chemoattractants

Abstract: Using solution methods, we have synthesized several series of L‐methionine homooligopeptides from the dipeptide to the hexapeptide with either a free α‐carboxyl function or different C‐blocking groups (methoxy, benzyloxy, benzy‐lamino) and with N‐blocking groups of either the amide type (formyl, pivaloyl) or the urethane type (tert.‐butyloxycarbonyl). Compounds were compared to determine the combined effect of main‐chain length and presence and nature of N‐ and C‐blocking groups on conformation‐activity relati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation emphasizes the importance of this group, which has been shown to be important in the formation of the peptide/receptor complex (25,26). First, the implication of the CO (formyl) into intramolecular H-bonds is shown to be the main conformational difference between normal and thiopeptides.…”
Section: Mlp-otrumentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This observation emphasizes the importance of this group, which has been shown to be important in the formation of the peptide/receptor complex (25,26). First, the implication of the CO (formyl) into intramolecular H-bonds is shown to be the main conformational difference between normal and thiopeptides.…”
Section: Mlp-otrumentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This result is in perfect agreement with the literature which emphasizes the importance of the availability of these two groups in the formation of the substrate-receptor complex. 7,16,39,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] The determination of the native structure of the fMLP analogs can be deduced by comparing the conformational preferences of the two tripeptides for the conformers that we have presented in Table1 and Table 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%