2022
DOI: 10.1039/d1cs01175h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Synthetic helical peptide capping strategies

Abstract: Peptidic helix mimics may be formed by “stapling” mid-helix side chains, or “capping” termini so hydrogen bond donors and acceptors there are satisfied. This review considers the differences between them and the potential areas for future development.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7,8 Strategies for designing helical peptidomimetics may feature stapling and N-and C-capping. 9 Many stapling methods have been investigated in depth, 10,11 and studies on N-cap mimics are common. 9,12,13 However, as far as we are aware, only two papers 14,15 mention synthetic C-cap mimics, and both comprise monocyclic rings.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7,8 Strategies for designing helical peptidomimetics may feature stapling and N-and C-capping. 9 Many stapling methods have been investigated in depth, 10,11 and studies on N-cap mimics are common. 9,12,13 However, as far as we are aware, only two papers 14,15 mention synthetic C-cap mimics, and both comprise monocyclic rings.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strategies for designing helical peptidomimetics may feature stapling and N - and C -capping . Many stapling methods have been investigated in depth, , and studies on N -cap mimics are common. ,, However, as far as we are aware, only two papers , mention synthetic C -cap mimics, and both comprise monocyclic rings. The first incorporated a 1,3-xylene linker between residue C 3 and C″ at the helix C -terminus with moderate helix-inducing effect, and the other is a dual-capped peptide (Figure e).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The free C- and/or N-terminal peptides are naturally vulnerable to all kinds of protease enzymes by restricting their in vivo curative potential and finally limiting their usage [ 56 , 57 , 60 ]. The approach of utilising a terminal capping group capable of terminating helices is a successful strategy to minimise the peptide bond sensitiveness towards proteolytic cleavage, thereby enhancing the affinity [ 61 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, linear peptide fragments serving as starting points for the development of PPI modulators generally suffer from low binding affinity, susceptibility to proteases and limited secondary structure in solution, rendering them suboptimal templates for peptide-based drug discovery. Stabilizing the secondary structure of a peptide fragment is considered a suitable strategy to address certain caveats of peptides, methods include the incorporation of salt bridges, metal chelating groups, and helix-nucleating moieties . Alternatively, macrocyclization of peptides by covalently cross-linking the side chains of two amino acid residues, also referred to as stapling , offers great potential .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stabilizing the secondary structure of a peptide fragment is considered a suitable strategy to address certain caveats of peptides, 2 methods include the incorporation of salt bridges, 3 metal chelating groups, 4 and helix-nucleating moieties. 5 Alternatively, macrocyclization of peptides by covalently cross-linking the side chains of two amino acid residues, also referred to as stapling, offers great potential. 6 This methodology is frequently employed in peptide drug discovery, 7 as macrocyclization can convey secondary structure, but has also been reported to improve the metabolic stability 8 and cell permeability 9 of peptide leads (Figure 1a).…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%